Skip to content

Hashing1#2292

Open
YogeshPardeshi wants to merge 3 commits into
super30admin:masterfrom
YogeshPardeshi:master
Open

Hashing1#2292
YogeshPardeshi wants to merge 3 commits into
super30admin:masterfrom
YogeshPardeshi:master

Conversation

@YogeshPardeshi
Copy link
Copy Markdown

No description provided.

@super30admin
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

Grouping Anagrams Together (Problem1.java)

Strengths:

  • Clean, readable code with meaningful variable names
  • Correct algorithm logic for grouping anagrams
  • Good use of HashMap for O(1) lookup
  • Proper handling of edge cases (empty strings, single characters)

Areas for Improvement:

  • Time complexity could be improved from O(N * K log K) to O(N * K) by using a character frequency count instead of sorting
  • Consider using map.computeIfAbsent(sortedStr, k -> new ArrayList<>()).add(str) to eliminate the containsKey check and make the code more concise
  • The class name "Problem1" is not descriptive; consider naming it something like "GroupAnagrams" or "Solution"

VERDICT: PASS


Isomorphic Strings (Problem2.java)

Strengths:

  • Clean, readable implementation with good variable naming (sChar, tChar)
  • Correct algorithm logic with proper early returns
  • Slightly more space-efficient than the reference by using a HashSet instead of a second HashMap
  • Well-structured with consistent indentation

Areas for Improvement:

  • The HashSet variable name set is too generic; consider renaming to something more descriptive like usedTargetChars
  • The reference solution's bidirectional mapping approach provides an additional safety check that this solution lacks (though the current approach is still correct)
  • Could add a length check at the beginning for early exit (though this is optional since constraints guarantee equal length)

Overall, this is a solid solution that correctly solves the problem with good efficiency.

VERDICT: PASS


Word Pattern (Problem3.java)

Strengths:

  • Correctly implements the bidirectional mapping logic
  • Clean and readable code structure
  • Proper handling of edge cases (length mismatch)
  • Good variable naming conventions

Areas for Improvement:

  • The code is functionally equivalent to the reference solution and doesn't require significant changes
  • Could consider using Map.getOrDefault() for slightly more concise code, but current approach is fine
  • The solution is production-ready as-is

VERDICT: PASS

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants