feat: support changing the isolation level - #142
Conversation
|
not really trsted because tests are broken on windows |
syphar
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
please add some tests where we can see if the different isolation levels work on windows.
How sure are we about compatibility? I wonder if we should run the whole windows testsuite for this (similar to what we do for gvisor), or if specific small tests are good enough.
how should i detect that? should i just test if docker returns 0? |
I think it's good enough to run a command with the isolation level is set. If the CLI accepts it, we can assume it's ok. In |
|
now it should be good to go |
|
why are buildtests skipped in ci? isnt that a bit counterintuitive |
|
should i implement |
Which are? some tests don't work on windows I think, from before I joined the project. I never had a windows system (and the time) to really try and see why. Feel free to reactivate some and see where we land. In any case, a test to see if the parameter works would be good. |
Im fine with or without. I added it for the new |
Just seeing the comment:
perhaps we can try reactivating this? Could be a separate PR. Since you seem to start using rustwide on a windows host, I would feel more comfortable with better test coverage |
|
ok, but we can merge this pr for now? |
Is there a way to just test if the arg works somehow? Not sure if the image-loading is faster now? or if we can use some smaller image? If too slow you could confirm that this is manually tested and we can proceed? |
No description provided.