Found in rust-analyzer#7796:
When trying to solve this goal:
Implemented({closure:ClosureId(3)}<[?0 := () for<0> [
?0 := (&'static 2<[?0 := ^1.0, ?1 := (&'static ^1.1)]>),
?1 := (&'static 2<[?0 := ^1.2, ?1 := ^1.1]>),
?2 := Ordering<[]>]
]> : FnMut<2<[
?0 := (&'static 2<[?0 := ^0.3, ?1 := ^0.4]>),
?1 := (&'static 2<[?0 := ^0.3, ?1 := ^0.4]>)
]>>)Chalk keeps expanding the query when trying to normalize this:
Normalize(<{closure:ClosureId(3)}<[?0 := () for<0> [
?0 := (&'static 2<[?0 := ^1.0, ?1 := EXPAND_1]>),
?1 := (&'static 2<[?0 := ^1.36, ?1 := EXPAND_2]>),
?2 := Ordering<[]>]
]> as FnOnce<2<[
?0 := (&'static 2<[?0 := ^0.38, ?1 := EXPAND_3]>),
?1 := (&'static 2<[?0 := ^0.38, ?1 := EXPAND_3)]>)
]>>>::Output -> Ordering<[]>)
EXPAND_1 = (&'^1.1 (&'^1.2 (&'^1.3 ... (&'^1.34 ^1.35))))
EXPAND_2 = (&'^1.2 (&'^1.3 (&'^1.4 ... (&'^1.34 ^1.37))))
EXPAND_3 = (&'static (&'static ... (&'static ^0.39)))It's tricky to translate the rust-analyzer example to a chalk test case because closures are involved, but hopefully this should be enough info to make the problem clear.
Found in rust-analyzer#7796:
When trying to solve this goal:
Chalk keeps expanding the query when trying to normalize this:
It's tricky to translate the rust-analyzer example to a chalk test case because closures are involved, but hopefully this should be enough info to make the problem clear.