This repository was archived by the owner on Jul 30, 2021. It is now read-only.
Open
Conversation
Member
|
Ah thanks for spearheading this. |
uuidcode
force-pushed
the
kotlin
branch
5 times, most recently
from
188fd84 to
7745d46
Compare
Member
|
Hi, I just wanted to say that in my opinion we could integrate Kotlin support in codegen more easily than Querydsl itself. |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
querydsl/querydsl#1828
I roughly wrote it.
I added test cases and verified kotlin compiling in many cases.
If this PR is acceptable, I think querydsl-maven-plugin and querydsl-codegen need to be changed.
I love querydsl and I hope querydsl will getting more popular.
thanks.