Skip to content

chore(deps): update actions/attest-build-provenance digest to 4d10147 - #1829

Merged
mldangelo-oai merged 2 commits into
mainfrom
renovate/actions-attest-build-provenance-digest
Sep 2, 2026
Merged

chore(deps): update actions/attest-build-provenance digest to 4d10147#1829
mldangelo-oai merged 2 commits into
mainfrom
renovate/actions-attest-build-provenance-digest

Conversation

@renovate

@renovate renovate Bot commented Sep 1, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

This PR contains the following updates:

Package Type Update Change
actions/attest-build-provenance (changelog) action digest 0f67c3f4d10147

Configuration

📅 Schedule: (UTC)

  • Branch creation
    • "monthly"
  • Automerge
    • At any time (no schedule defined)

🚦 Automerge: Disabled by config. Please merge this manually once you are satisfied.

Rebasing: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about this update again.


  • If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

This PR was generated by Mend Renovate. View the repository job log.

@codecov-commenter

codecov-commenter commented Sep 1, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 76.44%. Comparing base (8ef4062) to head (6ef3879).
⚠️ Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

Impacted file tree graph

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #1829   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   76.44%   76.44%           
=======================================
  Files         217      217           
  Lines      117071   117071           
  Branches    27634    27634           
=======================================
+ Hits        89497    89498    +1     
  Misses      20108    20108           
+ Partials     7466     7465    -1     

see 1 file with indirect coverage changes

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@codex review

Please review the exact current PR head a40ef070790a0ede26f31fdc8edb0199b48ab4b6.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@codex security review

Please review the exact current PR head a40ef070790a0ede26f31fdc8edb0199b48ab4b6 for security issues.

@chatgpt-codex-connector

chatgpt-codex-connector Bot commented Sep 1, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codex Review Summary

This comment shows the latest Codex review activity on this pull request.

Review Status Commit Review trigger
📝 Code Review Completed 2026-09-02T14:34:49.201659Z 6ef3879 Manual request
🔒 Security Review 🔄 Running since 2026-09-02T14:33:27.642173Z 6ef3879 Manual request
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review" or "@codex security review".

Codex reacts with 👀 while any review is running, comments if it has suggestions, and reacts with 👍 once all reviews finish with no findings.

@chatgpt-codex-connector

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codex Review: Didn't find any major issues. Already looking forward to the next diff.

Reviewed commit: a40ef07079

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

@chatgpt-codex-connector

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Security review completed. No security issues were found in this pull request.

Reviewed commit: a40ef07079

View security finding report

Only the user who started this review can view the report in Codex.

ℹ️ About Codex security reviews in GitHub

This is an experimental Codex feature. Security reviews are triggered when:

  • You comment "@codex security review"
  • A regular code review gets triggered (for example, "@codex review" or when a PR is opened), and you’re opted in so security review runs alongside code review

Once complete, Codex will leave suggestions, or a comment if no findings are found.

@mldangelo-oai

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@codex review exact head 6ef3879.

@mldangelo-oai

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@codex security review exact head 6ef3879.

@renovate

renovate Bot commented Sep 2, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Edited/Blocked Notification

Renovate will not automatically rebase this PR, because it does not recognize the last commit author and assumes somebody else may have edited the PR.

You can manually request rebase by checking the rebase/retry box above.

⚠️ Warning: custom changes will be lost.

@chatgpt-codex-connector

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codex Review: Didn't find any major issues. Breezy!

Reviewed commit: 6ef3879a1b

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

@chatgpt-codex-connector

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Security review completed. No security issues were found in this pull request.

Reviewed commit: 6ef3879a1b

View security finding report

Only the user who started this review can view the report in Codex.

ℹ️ About Codex security reviews in GitHub

This is an experimental Codex feature. Security reviews are triggered when:

  • You comment "@codex security review"
  • A regular code review gets triggered (for example, "@codex review" or when a PR is opened), and you’re opted in so security review runs alongside code review

Once complete, Codex will leave suggestions, or a comment if no findings are found.

@mldangelo-oai mldangelo-oai left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Reviewed exact head 6ef3879. The effective diff is limited to two verified actions/attest-build-provenance v4.2.2 pins; release permissions and ordering are unchanged, independent review found no P0–P2 issues, all exact-head CI passed, and review threads are clear.

@mldangelo-oai
mldangelo-oai merged commit a11d58a into main Sep 2, 2026
43 checks passed
@mldangelo-oai
mldangelo-oai deleted the renovate/actions-attest-build-provenance-digest branch September 2, 2026 15:00
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants