You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Umbrella tracking issue for the 11 follow-ups filed after the senior-Rust review of #43. Groups them into execution waves so contributors can pick work without blocking each other.
Source plan: `.claude/plans/dreamy-whistling-haven.md` (local). The original P0 batch already shipped in #43 commit `a50eead`.
Why first: zero coupling, zero risk to other in-flight work, individually mergeable. #47 is investigation-only and feeds Wave 2.
Wave 2 — structural (after Wave 1, depends on #47)
Module-shape changes that touch many files. Need #47's borrow audit to land first so we know whether `ShardManifest` needs to become `RefCell`-wrapped before the structural cleanup.
S (warning only; real overflow-pages fix is its own phase)
Why second:#51 unblocks clean module boundaries. #45 is independent but should land before #50 (feature gate) to avoid reworking the cfg decoration. #48 needs the new module shape from #51.
Why last: `#[cfg(feature = "disk-offload")]` will need to decorate every file the previous waves touched. Doing this last means the gating PR is purely additive (`cfg` annotations + `Cargo.toml`) and does not conflict with any in-flight work. Once it lands, the tokio CI matrix will verify the gates compile cleanly.
Umbrella tracking issue for the 11 follow-ups filed after the senior-Rust review of #43. Groups them into execution waves so contributors can pick work without blocking each other.
Source plan: `.claude/plans/dreamy-whistling-haven.md` (local). The original P0 batch already shipped in #43 commit `a50eead`.
Dependency map
graph LR subgraph W1["Wave 1 — isolated, parallelizable"] I44["#44 P0-6 ext: bounded LZ4 (kv_page ×2, warm_search)"] I49["#49 P1-6: DiskANN io error propagation"] I46["#46 P1-3: streaming cold-tier decode"] I53["#53 P2-4: format_version headers"] I47["#47 P1-4: ShardManifest borrow audit"] end subgraph W2["Wave 2 — structural"] I51["#51 P2-2: break manifest cycle"] I45["#45 P1-2: precompute shard_dir"] I48["#48 P1-5: manifest MAX_INLINE_ENTRIES cap"] end subgraph W3["Wave 3 — recovery hardening"] I52["#52 P2-3: index manifest in recovery"] I54["#54 P2-5: recovery test coverage gaps"] end subgraph W4["Wave 4 — global cross-cut"] I50["#50 P2-1: Cargo feature gate disk-offload"] end I47 --> I51 I51 --> I48 I51 --> I52 I52 --> I54 I45 --> I50 I51 --> I50 I44 --> I50 I46 --> I50 I49 --> I50 I53 --> I50 I48 --> I50 I54 --> I50Wave 1 — isolated fixes (start here in parallel)
These are surgical, single-module, no dependencies on each other. Five different contributors can take them simultaneously.
Why first: zero coupling, zero risk to other in-flight work, individually mergeable. #47 is investigation-only and feeds Wave 2.
Wave 2 — structural (after Wave 1, depends on #47)
Module-shape changes that touch many files. Need #47's borrow audit to land first so we know whether `ShardManifest` needs to become `RefCell`-wrapped before the structural cleanup.
Why second: #51 unblocks clean module boundaries. #45 is independent but should land before #50 (feature gate) to avoid reworking the cfg decoration. #48 needs the new module shape from #51.
Wave 3 — recovery hardening (after Wave 2)
Why third: #52 changes recovery internals; #54's new tests target that code so they should be authored after the refactor.
Wave 4 — global cross-cut (last)
Why last: `#[cfg(feature = "disk-offload")]` will need to decorate every file the previous waves touched. Doing this last means the gating PR is purely additive (`cfg` annotations + `Cargo.toml`) and does not conflict with any in-flight work. Once it lands, the tokio CI matrix will verify the gates compile cleanly.
Suggested branch / PR layout
Out of scope for this roadmap