-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 8.2k
Fall back to epoll_wait when epoll_pwait2 is unavailable at runtime #23825
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This is not pretty: When pwait2 is unavailable at runtime, folks are paying for true branches, with one of them
UNEXPECTED(). I would suggest making it a realelseand thengotofrom line 194 into the else part, similarly to:php-src/ext/random/zend_utils.c
Line 40 in 410e61d
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
but this is for
HAVE_EPOLL_PWAIT2which means a case when it was compiled with such support but it runs on older kernel later. I was kind of assuming that such case should be UNEXPECTED...There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
My understanding is that UNEXPECTED is a very strong hint that the branch will not be taken. But that is not true: Once it is taken once, it will always be taken.
But I'm now realizing: This will likely always perform two atomic loads, even when pwait2 is actually available, since the compiler can't assume that the atomic doesn't change between the two conditions.
An explicit
else(+ goto) has clearer semantics and should be faster in all cases. I wouldn't add any expected/unexpected hints, this is something that should be easily handled by the branch predictor.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This is correct. Generally, UNEXPECTED tends to move the code to the cold text section, use it generally only for error-handling code.
Also true
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Ok, see #24026