Skip to content

OCPBUGS-66217: PerformanceProfile and Tuned CRDs during bootstrap - #1596

Open
MarSik wants to merge 1 commit into
openshift:mainfrom
MarSik:bootstrap-crds
Open

OCPBUGS-66217: PerformanceProfile and Tuned CRDs during bootstrap#1596
MarSik wants to merge 1 commit into
openshift:mainfrom
MarSik:bootstrap-crds

Conversation

@MarSik

@MarSik MarSik commented Aug 20, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Make sure both the main NTO CRDs are deployed early on bootstrap so day 0 rendering can rely on those two CRDs being available.

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Improvements
    • Updated performance and node-tuning resource definitions to support required initialization during system setup.

Make sure both the main NTO CRDs are deployed early on bootstrap
so day 0 rendering can rely on those two CRDs being available.
@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type. jira/invalid-bug Indicates that a referenced Jira bug is invalid for the branch this PR is targeting. labels Aug 20, 2026
@openshift-ci-robot

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@MarSik: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-66217, which is invalid:

  • expected the bug to target the "5.1.0" version, but no target version was set

Comment /jira refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Jira bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker.

Details

In response to this:

Make sure both the main NTO CRDs are deployed early on bootstrap so day 0 rendering can rely on those two CRDs being available.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@openshift-merge-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Pipeline controller notification
This repo is configured to use the pipeline controller. Second-stage tests will be triggered either automatically or after lgtm label is added, depending on the repository configuration. The pipeline controller will automatically detect which contexts are required and will utilize /test Prow commands to trigger the second stage.

For optional jobs, comment /test ? to see a list of all defined jobs. To trigger manually all jobs from second stage use /pipeline required command.

This repository is configured in: LGTM mode

@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Aug 20, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉

ℹ️ Recent review info
⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Repository: openshift/coderabbit/.coderabbit.yaml

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro Plus

Run ID: 96f322ed-57df-4a9d-882e-8ef16b7e2e1e

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between e4e47dc and 84be74d.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • manifests/20-performance-profile.crd.yaml
  • manifests/20-tuned.crd.yaml

Included review availability: Your plan provides up to 2 included reviews per hour; 1 remains after this review.


Walkthrough

The PerformanceProfile and Tuned custom resource definitions now include the release.openshift.io/bootstrap-required: "true" annotation.

Changes

CRD bootstrap annotations

Layer / File(s) Summary
Add bootstrap annotations
manifests/20-performance-profile.crd.yaml, manifests/20-tuned.crd.yaml
Both CRDs now declare the release.openshift.io/bootstrap-required: "true" annotation.

Estimated code review effort: 1 (Trivial) | ~2 minutes

Merge Risk: ⚪ Minimal · up to 84be7

This is a small, localized CRD manifest change to make the required resources available earlier during bootstrap; no actionable merge-blocking risk remains beyond normal checks and review.

Suggested reviewers: tal-or

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 15
✅ Passed checks (15 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Description Check ✅ Passed Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Title check ✅ Passed The title clearly identifies the two CRDs and their deployment during bootstrap, which matches the main change.
Docstring Coverage ✅ Passed No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.
Linked Issues check ✅ Passed Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Out of Scope Changes check ✅ Passed Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Stable And Deterministic Test Names ✅ Passed The pull request changes only two YAML CRD annotations; it adds no Ginkgo test titles or dynamic test-name content.
Test Structure And Quality ✅ Passed The pull request changes only two CRD YAML annotations; the parent-to-HEAD diff contains no Ginkgo or test files, so these test-quality requirements are not applicable.
Microshift Test Compatibility ✅ Passed The pull request changes only two CRD manifest annotations and adds no Ginkgo e2e tests, so the MicroShift test compatibility check is not applicable.
Single Node Openshift (Sno) Test Compatibility ✅ Passed The commit changes only two CRD YAML annotations and adds no Ginkgo e2e tests, so the SNO multi-node test check is not applicable.
Topology-Aware Scheduling Compatibility ✅ Passed The patch only adds bootstrap-required annotations to two CRDs; it adds no replicas, affinity, topology spread, node selectors, tolerations, or disruption budgets.
Ote Binary Stdout Contract ✅ Passed The diff only adds bootstrap annotations to two CRD YAML files; it changes no main, suite setup, or process-level stdout behavior.
Ipv6 And Disconnected Network Test Compatibility ✅ Passed The PR changes only two CRD annotations; it adds no Ginkgo tests, IPv4 assumptions, or external connectivity requirements.
No-Weak-Crypto ✅ Passed The patch adds only two bootstrap-required annotations. The introduced lines contain no MD5, SHA1, DES, RC4, Blowfish, ECB, or crypto implementation.
Container-Privileges ✅ Passed The PR changes only two CRD annotations; neither changed manifest contains privileged, hostPID, hostNetwork, hostIPC, SYS_ADMIN, or allowPrivilegeEscalation settings.
No-Sensitive-Data-In-Logs ✅ Passed The pull request changes only two CRD YAML annotations; it adds no logging statements or sensitive data exposure.
✨ Finishing Touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.

@openshift-ci
openshift-ci Bot requested review from Tal-or and swatisehgal August 20, 2026 09:55
@openshift-ci openshift-ci Bot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Aug 20, 2026

@Tal-or Tal-or left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm

@openshift-ci openshift-ci Bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Aug 20, 2026
@openshift-ci

openshift-ci Bot commented Aug 20, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: MarSik, Tal-or

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Details Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-merge-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Scheduling required tests:
/test e2e-aws-operator
/test e2e-aws-ovn
/test e2e-aws-ovn-techpreview
/test e2e-gcp-pao
/test e2e-gcp-pao-updating-profile
/test e2e-gcp-pao-workloadhints
/test e2e-hypershift
/test e2e-hypershift-pao
/test e2e-no-cluster
/test e2e-upgrade

@MarSik

MarSik commented Aug 20, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

/jira refresh

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added jira/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Jira bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. and removed jira/invalid-bug Indicates that a referenced Jira bug is invalid for the branch this PR is targeting. labels Aug 20, 2026
@openshift-ci-robot

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@MarSik: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-66217, which is valid. The bug has been moved to the POST state.

3 validation(s) were run on this bug
  • bug is open, matching expected state (open)
  • bug target version (5.1.0) matches configured target version for branch (5.1.0)
  • bug is in the state ASSIGNED, which is one of the valid states (NEW, ASSIGNED, POST)

No GitHub users were found matching the public email listed for the QA contact in Jira (dhensel@redhat.com), skipping review request.

Details

In response to this:

/jira refresh

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@openshift-ci

openshift-ci Bot commented Aug 20, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@MarSik: all tests passed!

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Details

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. jira/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Jira bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants