Skip to content

Add aurora to reviewers and approvers - #519

Open
eth1030 wants to merge 1 commit into
openshift:masterfrom
eth1030:aurora-owners
Open

Add aurora to reviewers and approvers#519
eth1030 wants to merge 1 commit into
openshift:masterfrom
eth1030:aurora-owners

Conversation

@eth1030

@eth1030 eth1030 commented Aug 14, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Chores
    • Updated the project’s review and approval coverage to include an additional functional team.

@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Aug 14, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉

ℹ️ Recent review info
⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Repository YAML (base), Central YAML (inherited)

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Enterprise

Run ID: 281a6cdc-003b-4617-ac0d-f658844b0330

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 1584c54 and cc5f86f.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • OWNERS

Walkthrough

The OWNERS file adds srep-functional-team-aurora to the reviewers and approvers lists.

Changes

OWNERS role assignment

Layer / File(s) Summary
Add reviewer and approver roles
OWNERS
Adds srep-functional-team-aurora to both the reviewer and approver lists.

Estimated code review effort: 1 (Trivial) | ~2 minutes

Merge Risk: ⚪ Minimal · up to cc5f8

This localized reviewer and approver configuration change introduces no actionable merge-blocking risk and is merge-ready after normal checks and review.

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 15
✅ Passed checks (15 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Description Check ✅ Passed Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Title check ✅ Passed The title clearly describes adding Aurora to the reviewers and approvers lists in OWNERS.
Docstring Coverage ✅ Passed No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.
Linked Issues check ✅ Passed Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Out of Scope Changes check ✅ Passed Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Stable And Deterministic Test Names ✅ Passed The pull request changes only OWNERS by adding a reviewer and approver. It introduces no Ginkgo test titles or dynamic test-name content.
Test Structure And Quality ✅ Passed The commit changes only two OWNERS entries; it adds no Ginkgo test code, resources, waits, or assertions to assess.
Microshift Test Compatibility ✅ Passed The pull request changes only OWNERS by adding a reviewer and approver; it adds no Ginkgo tests or MicroShift-incompatible API usage.
Single Node Openshift (Sno) Test Compatibility ✅ Passed The commit changes only OWNERS by adding a reviewer and approver; it adds no Ginkgo e2e tests or multi-node assumptions.
Topology-Aware Scheduling Compatibility ✅ Passed The diff changes only OWNERS reviewer and approver lists; it adds no deployment manifests, operator code, controllers, or scheduling constraints.
Ote Binary Stdout Contract ✅ Passed The target-to-HEAD diff changes only OWNERS by adding one reviewer and one approver; it adds no executable code or process-level stdout writes.
Ipv6 And Disconnected Network Test Compatibility ✅ Passed The patch changes only OWNERS; it adds no Ginkgo e2e tests or networking behavior, so this check is not applicable.
No-Weak-Crypto ✅ Passed The diff only adds an OWNERS reviewer and approver entry; it introduces no cryptographic algorithm, comparison, or custom crypto implementation.
Container-Privileges ✅ Passed The diff changes only OWNERS by adding a reviewer and approver; it adds no container or Kubernetes manifest privilege settings.
No-Sensitive-Data-In-Logs ✅ Passed The diff changes only OWNERS by adding a reviewer and approver; it introduces no logging code or sensitive data exposure path.
✨ Finishing Touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.

@openshift-ci

openshift-ci Bot commented Aug 14, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: eth1030
Once this PR has been reviewed and has the lgtm label, please assign boranx for approval. For more information see the Code Review Process.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Details Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@codecov

codecov Bot commented Aug 14, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 41.57%. Comparing base (1584c54) to head (cc5f86f).

Additional details and impacted files

Impacted file tree graph

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master     #519   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   41.57%   41.57%           
=======================================
  Files          27       27           
  Lines        2665     2665           
=======================================
  Hits         1108     1108           
  Misses       1478     1478           
  Partials       79       79           
🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@eth1030

eth1030 commented Aug 14, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

/test validate

1 similar comment
@eth1030

eth1030 commented Aug 14, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

/test validate

@eth1030

eth1030 commented Aug 14, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Looks like boilerplate needs to be updated first --> #517

@openshift-ci

openshift-ci Bot commented Aug 15, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@eth1030: The following tests failed, say /retest to rerun all failed tests or /retest-required to rerun all mandatory failed tests:

Test name Commit Details Required Rerun command
ci/prow/lint cc5f86f link true /test lint
ci/prow/validate cc5f86f link true /test validate

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Details

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant