Skip to content

Test !bench cslib - #19

Draft
Garmelon wants to merge 4 commits into
masterfrom
joscha/bench-cslib
Draft

Test !bench cslib#19
Garmelon wants to merge 4 commits into
masterfrom
joscha/bench-cslib

Conversation

@Garmelon

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

No description provided.

@Garmelon

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator Author

!bench cslib

@Garmelon

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator Author

!bench mathlib

@leanprover-radar

leanprover-radar commented Jul 28, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Benchmark results for adc9157 against 219a6e0 are in. No significant results found. @Garmelon

  • 🟥 build//instructions: +20.0G (+0.01%)

No significant changes detected.

@leanprover-radar

leanprover-radar commented Jul 28, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Benchmark results for adc9157 against 219a6e0 are in. There are significant results. @Garmelon

  • 🟥 main exited with code 127

No significant changes detected.

@Garmelon

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator Author

!bench cslib

@leanprover-radar

leanprover-radar commented Jul 28, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Benchmark results for b096035 against 219a6e0 are in. No significant results found. @Garmelon

No significant changes detected.

@downstream-lean4

downstream-lean4 Bot commented Jul 28, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Build report for bing bong

Stayed green
Repo Critical Build Test Lint
aesop ✅ in 0m ✅ in 0m ⏭️
batteries ✅ in 0m ✅ in 0m ✅ in 0m
import-graph ✅ in 0m ✅ in 0m ⏭️
lean4-cli ✅ in 0m ✅ in 0m ⏭️
mathlib4 ✅ in 19m ✅ in 1m ✅ in 1m
plausible ✅ in 0m ✅ in 0m ⏭️
ProofWidgets4 ✅ in 0m ✅ in 0m ⏭️
quote4 ✅ in 0m ✅ in 0m ⏭️
reference-manual ✅ in 1m ⏭️ ⏭️
BibtexQuery ✅ in 0m ⏭️ ⏭️
comparator ✅ in 0m ⏭️ ⏭️
cslib ✅ in 1m ✅ in 0m ✅ in 0m
doc-gen4 ✅ in 0m ⏭️ ⏭️
illuminate ✅ in 0m ✅ in 0m ⏭️
lean4-unicode-basic ✅ in 0m ✅ in 0m ⏭️
lean4export ✅ in 0m ✅ in 0m ⏭️
LeanSearchClient ✅ in 0m ✅ in 0m ⏭️
leansqlite ✅ in 0m ✅ in 0m ⏭️
repl ✅ in 0m ✅ in 0m ⏭️
verso ✅ in 2m ✅ in 1m ⏭️
verso-slides ✅ in 1m ✅ in 0m ⏭️
verso-web-components ✅ in 0m ⏭️ ⏭️

View run

@Garmelon
Garmelon force-pushed the joscha/bench-cslib branch 2 times, most recently from f258d6a to 1a39f52 Compare July 28, 2026 16:25
@Garmelon Garmelon closed this Jul 28, 2026
@Garmelon
Garmelon force-pushed the joscha/bench-cslib branch from 1a39f52 to 5054f42 Compare July 28, 2026 20:22
@Garmelon Garmelon reopened this Jul 28, 2026
@Garmelon

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator Author

!bench cslib

@leanprover-radar

leanprover-radar commented Jul 28, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Benchmark results for 60601d7 against 5054f42 are in. No significant results found. @Garmelon

  • 🟥 build//instructions: +127.9M (+0.01%)

No significant changes detected.

@Garmelon

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator Author

!bench cslib

@leanprover-radar

leanprover-radar commented Jul 30, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Benchmark results for 4dc6a4b against 0ee7c40 are in. There are significant results. @Garmelon

  • 🟥 main exited with code 1

No significant changes detected.

@Garmelon

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator Author

!bench cslib

@leanprover-radar

leanprover-radar commented Jul 30, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Benchmark results for f13c7df against 37723ac are in. No significant results found. @Garmelon

  • 🟥 build//instructions: +46.0M (+0.00%)

No significant changes detected.

@Garmelon

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator Author

!bench cslib

@leanprover-radar

leanprover-radar commented Jul 30, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Benchmark results for 225d321 against 37723ac are in. No significant results found. @Garmelon

Warning

These warnings may indicate that the benchmark results are not directly comparable, for example due to changes in the runner configuration or hardware.

  • Scripts for run main differ between commits.
  • Bench repo commit hashes for run main differ between commits.
  • 🟥 build//instructions: +1.8G (+0.09%)

No significant changes detected.

@Garmelon

Garmelon commented Jul 30, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator Author

I think this looks good, yay

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants