Conversation
|
|
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.
1 Skipped Deployment
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
PR Review Summary
(1) Total Issues | Risk: Low
🟡 Minor (1) 🟡
🟡 1) functions.ts + subAgentFunctionTools.ts Terminology split: "Function Definitions" vs "Function Tools"
Issue: The PR introduces "Function Definitions" as the new name for the base entity (in functions.ts), but the relation routes in subAgentFunctionTools.ts continue to use "Function Tools". This creates a vocabulary split where the base entity is now called "Function Definition" but the assignment relation still references "Function Tool".
Why: This may confuse API consumers about whether "Function" and "Function Definition" refer to the same entity. The auto-generated API reference docs will reflect this inconsistency — the Functions page will have operations like "List Function Definitions" while the Function Tools page will have operations like "List Function Tools assigned to a SubAgent".
Fix: Consider one of:
- Keep summaries as "List Functions", "Create Function" etc. (no change) for consistency with existing terminology
- Apply the "Definition" pattern to Function Tools routes as well (e.g., "List Function Definitions assigned to a SubAgent")
- Clarify in documentation that "Functions" and "Function Definitions" are the same concept
Refs:
- functions.ts:49 — "List Function Definitions"
- subAgentFunctionTools.ts:46 — "List Function Tools assigned to a SubAgent"
💭 Consider (2) 💭
Inline Comments:
- 💭 Consider:
functions.ts:96Inconsistent "by ID" suffix pattern - 💭 Consider:
subAgentToolRelations.ts:131Inconsistent article usage ("a/an")
💡 APPROVE WITH SUGGESTIONS
Summary: This is a thoughtful improvement to API documentation clarity. The action-verb phrasing ("Assign", "Unassign") is more intuitive than the previous CRUD-style naming, and adding "MCP" to Tools helps distinguish them from Function Tools. The main consideration is the terminology split between "Function Definitions" and "Function Tools" which could be addressed for consistency. The inline suggestions are minor stylistic nitpicks — take them or leave them as you see fit. Nice cleanup! 🎉
Discarded (3)
| Location | Issue | Reason Discarded |
|---|---|---|
multi-file |
Action verbs (Assign/Unassign) vs CRUD verbs pattern | This is a positive improvement for user clarity, not an issue to fix |
multi-file |
Sentence-style summaries vs terse style | The new style is more descriptive and user-friendly; this is an intentional improvement |
system |
Docs auto-generation may be stale | Docs are auto-generated and will be updated by CI/CD; not a blocker |
Reviewers (3)
| Reviewer | Returned | Main Findings | Consider | While You're Here | Inline Comments | Pending Recs | Discarded |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
pr-review-standards |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
pr-review-consistency |
5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 3 |
pr-review-product |
3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Total | 8 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 5 |
| method: 'get', | ||
| path: '/{id}', | ||
| summary: 'Get Function by ID', | ||
| summary: 'Get Function Definition by ID', |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💭 Consider: Inconsistent "by ID" suffix
Issue: This route uses "Get Function Definition by ID" while tools.ts uses "Get MCP Tool" (no "by ID" suffix). The majority of routes in the codebase omit the "by ID" suffix.
Why: Minor inconsistency within this PR and with the broader codebase pattern.
Fix: Consider removing "by ID" to match the dominant pattern:
| summary: 'Get Function Definition by ID', | |
| summary: 'Get Function Definition', |
Refs:
| method: 'get', | ||
| path: '/{id}', | ||
| summary: 'Get SubAgent Tool Relation', | ||
| summary: 'Get a SubAgent MCP Tool assignment by ID', |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💭 Consider: Inconsistent article usage
Issue: This summary uses "Get a SubAgent MCP Tool assignment by ID" with an article, while most other routes omit articles (e.g., "Get SubAgent", "Get MCP Tool").
Why: Minor stylistic inconsistency with the established pattern across the codebase.
Fix: Consider removing the article for consistency:
| summary: 'Get a SubAgent MCP Tool assignment by ID', | |
| summary: 'Get SubAgent MCP Tool assignment by ID', |
Refs:
No description provided.