Fix remaining voice inconsistencies in registry and VIP docs#150
Open
mintlify[bot] wants to merge 1 commit intomainfrom
Open
Fix remaining voice inconsistencies in registry and VIP docs#150mintlify[bot] wants to merge 1 commit intomainfrom
mintlify[bot] wants to merge 1 commit intomainfrom
Conversation
Generated-By: mintlify-agent
Contributor
Author
|
Preview deployment for your docs. Learn more about Mintlify Previews.
|
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary
Converted lingering third-person prose to second person to match the predominant voice across the docs.
developers/developer-guides/integrating-initia-apps/registry/introduction.mdx: "teams and developers should also register" → "you should also register" (rest of file already uses "you").home/core-concepts/vip/architecture.mdx: "users can choose the duration..." → "you can select the duration..." (preceding paragraph already addresses the reader as "you", and aligns with the site's preference for "select" over "choose").No technical content, code samples, or API references were modified. The rest of the docs were scanned and found to be consistent following recent style PRs.