BE-853: Add the initial `problematic` crate by TimDiekmann · Pull Request #9683 · hashintel/hash

TimDiekmann · 2026-09-11T15:38:37Z

🌟 What is the purpose of this PR?

Add the initial problematic Rust crate as the shared data model for HTTP Problem Details in the public Graph API. It provides serializable problem documents with typed extension members and optional JSON Schema generation. Invalid extension shapes and collisions with standard member names fail with a Serde error during serialization.

🔗 Related links

BE-853: Add the initial problematic crate (internal)
BE-353: Design and implement an Error Model for cross-API communication (internal)

🚫 Blocked by

No prerequisites.

🔍 What does this change?

Add public ProblemType metadata, generic ProblemDetails<'kind, 'occurrence, E>, and NoExtensions.
Allow problem metadata and occurrence strings to be borrowed through Cow with separate lifetimes. Deserialization owns these strings and supports from_value and from_reader when the extension type implements DeserializeOwned.
Flatten extension members into the document. A serializer adapter rejects non-object extensions and top-level type, title, status, detail, or instance members, while allowing these names in nested objects.
Generate JSON Schema through the optional schemars feature, including examples and URI-reference annotations.
Add integration tests and JSON snapshot files, licenses, crate documentation, and Cargo/Turborepo workspace configuration.

Pre-Merge Checklist 🚀

🚢 Has this modified a publishable library?

This PR:

modifies a Cargo-publishable library, but it is not yet ready to publish

📜 Does this require a change to the docs?

The changes in this PR:

require changes to docs which are made as part of this PR

🕸️ Does this require a change to the Turbo Graph?

The changes in this PR:

add a package using the existing lint:clippy and test:unit task definitions, with workspace wiring and task-dependency documentation included.

⚠️ Known issues

The crate is an initial draft at version 0.0.0-reserved. Its API is still evolving.

🐾 Next steps

Continue the HTTP response, handler, middleware, and OpenAPI integration under BE-353.

🛡 What tests cover this?

Twenty-one integration tests cover typed extension roundtrips, borrowed fields and owned deserialization, omitted occurrence fields, invalid extension shapes, reserved member names, nested objects, map-key serialization, error propagation, and the base and extended JSON schemas. Eighteen run without the schemars feature. The static metadata example is covered by a doc-test.

❓ How to test this?

cargo nextest run --package problematic --all-features
cargo nextest run --package problematic --no-default-features
cargo test --package problematic --all-features --doc
cargo clippy --package problematic --all-features --all-targets --no-deps
cargo doc --package problematic --all-features --no-deps

📹 Demo

The base and extended schemas are available as .snap.json files under libs/problematic/rust/tests/snapshots.

vercel · 2026-09-11T15:38:44Z

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.

4 Skipped Deployments

Project	Deployment	Actions	Updated
hash	Ignored	Preview	Sep 12, 2026 1:08pm UTC
hashdotdesign-tokens	Ignored	Preview	Sep 12, 2026 1:08pm UTC
petrinaut	Skipped		Sep 12, 2026 1:08pm UTC
petrinaut-docs	Skipped		Sep 12, 2026 1:08pm UTC

github-advanced-security · 2026-09-11T15:42:13Z

You are seeing this message because GitHub Code Scanning has recently been set up for this repository, or this pull request contains the workflow file for the Code Scanning tool.

What Enabling Code Scanning Means:

The 'Security' tab will display more code scanning analysis results (e.g., for the default branch).
Depending on your configuration and choice of analysis tool, future pull requests will be annotated with code scanning analysis results.
You will be able to see the analysis results for the pull request's branch on this overview once the scans have completed and the checks have passed.

For more information about GitHub Code Scanning, check out the documentation.

codecov · 2026-09-11T15:44:04Z

Codecov Report

❌ Patch coverage is 60.08230% with 97 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.
✅ Project coverage is 65.89%. Comparing base (fb728e4) to head (0a39b46).
⚠️ Report is 21 commits behind head on main.

Files with missing lines	Patch %	Lines
libs/problematic/rust/src/serialization/key.rs	27.27%	72 Missing ⚠️
libs/problematic/rust/src/serialization/mod.rs	82.63%	25 Missing ⚠️

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #9683      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   65.90%   65.89%   -0.01%     
==========================================
  Files        1887     1889       +2     
  Lines      198443   198686     +243     
  Branches     8248     8248              
==========================================
+ Hits       130774   130918     +144     
- Misses      66139    66238      +99     
  Partials     1530     1530

Flag	Coverage Δ
rust.problematic	`60.08% <60.08%> (?)`

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Harness.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

codspeed-hq · 2026-09-11T15:47:25Z

Merging this PR will not alter performance

⚠️

6 benchmarks measured no execution time

Nothing ran under measurement, usually because the compiler removed the code under test. These results are not comparable, so they count as unchanged.

Preventing compiler optimizations

✅ 98 untouched benchmarks

Performance Changes

	Benchmark	`BASE`	`HEAD`	Efficiency
⚠️	`as_constant`	< 1 ns	< 1 ns	N/A
⚠️	`constant_equal`	< 1 ns	< 1 ns	N/A
⚠️	`constant_not_equal`	< 1 ns	< 1 ns	N/A
⚠️	`access`	< 1 ns	< 1 ns	N/A
⚠️	`runtime_equal`	< 1 ns	< 1 ns	N/A
⚠️	`runtime_not_equal`	< 1 ns	< 1 ns	N/A

_{Comparing t/be-853-add-the-initial-problematic-crate (0a39b46) with main (67f60d5)¹}

No successful run was found on main (8aedda0) during the generation of this report, so 67f60d5 was used instead as the comparison base. There might be some changes unrelated to this pull request in this report. ↩

github-actions · 2026-09-11T17:47:05Z

Benchmark results

@rust/hash-graph-benches – Integrations

policy_resolution_large

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 2002	$$27.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 200 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.392 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.56 \mathrm{ms} \pm 22.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.67 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 1002	$$12.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 93.5 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.389 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: high, policies: 3314	$$43.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 410 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.921 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$15.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 131 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}5.34 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: medium, policies: 1527	$$24.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 187 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.45 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 2078	$$28.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 239 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.255 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.80 \mathrm{ms} \pm 23.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.07 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 1033	$$13.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 127 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.417 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

policy_resolution_medium

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 102	$$3.87 \mathrm{ms} \pm 27.7 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.122 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.03 \mathrm{ms} \pm 17.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.881 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 52	$$3.36 \mathrm{ms} \pm 17.2 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-3.189 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: high, policies: 269	$$5.30 \mathrm{ms} \pm 44.7 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.125 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.60 \mathrm{ms} \pm 30.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.138 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: medium, policies: 108	$$4.29 \mathrm{ms} \pm 60.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.59 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 133	$$4.51 \mathrm{ms} \pm 35.5 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.440 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.49 \mathrm{ms} \pm 23.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.372 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 63	$$4.28 \mathrm{ms} \pm 38.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.544 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

policy_resolution_none

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 2	$$2.79 \mathrm{ms} \pm 21.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.780 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$2.72 \mathrm{ms} \pm 18.2 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.709 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 2	$$2.84 \mathrm{ms} \pm 18.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.630 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 8	$$3.09 \mathrm{ms} \pm 22.5 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.320 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$2.89 \mathrm{ms} \pm 17.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.557 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 3	$$3.18 \mathrm{ms} \pm 19.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.189 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

policy_resolution_small

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 52	$$3.15 \mathrm{ms} \pm 23.7 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.970 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$2.82 \mathrm{ms} \pm 16.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.802 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 26	$$3.03 \mathrm{ms} \pm 18.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.323 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: high, policies: 94	$$3.57 \mathrm{ms} \pm 19.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.036 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.08 \mathrm{ms} \pm 26.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.669 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: medium, policies: 27	$$3.38 \mathrm{ms} \pm 20.4 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.151 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 66	$$3.44 \mathrm{ms} \pm 24.7 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.377 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.09 \mathrm{ms} \pm 22.4 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.054 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 29	$$3.35 \mathrm{ms} \pm 17.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.158 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

read_scaling_complete

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_id;one_depth	1 entities	$$32.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 200 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.138 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;one_depth	10 entities	$$70.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 540 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.537 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;one_depth	25 entities	$$35.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 215 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.500 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;one_depth	5 entities	$$39.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 203 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.772 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;one_depth	50 entities	$$42.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 303 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.68 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	1 entities	$$33.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 199 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.047 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	10 entities	$$418 \mathrm{ms} \pm 1.11 \mathrm{ms}\left({\color{gray}-2.709 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	25 entities	$$91.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 637 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.578 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	5 entities	$$79.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 451 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.281 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	50 entities	$$274 \mathrm{ms} \pm 1.01 \mathrm{ms}\left({\color{gray}0.560 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	1 entities	$$10.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 70.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.439 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	10 entities	$$10.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 58.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.761 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	25 entities	$$10.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 61.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.099 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	5 entities	$$10.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 59.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.049 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	50 entities	$$10.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 63.4 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.271 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

read_scaling_linkless

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_id	1 entities	$$10.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 67.7 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.845 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	10 entities	$$10.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 60.5 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.00 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	100 entities	$$10.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 60.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.396 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	1000 entities	$$10.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 54.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.466 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	10000 entities	$$10.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 80.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.010 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

representative_read_entity

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_id	entity type ID: `https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/block/v/1`	$$10.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 63.7 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.583 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: `https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/book/v/1`	$$11.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 56.4 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.687 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: `https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/building/v/1`	$$10.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 60.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.639 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: `https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/organization/v/1`	$$10.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 52.5 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.333 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: `https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/page/v/2`	$$11.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 85.5 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.220 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: `https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/person/v/1`	$$11.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 96.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.89 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: `https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/playlist/v/1`	$$11.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 76.7 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.328 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: `https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/song/v/1`	$$10.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 57.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.150 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: `https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/uk-address/v/1`	$$11.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 56.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.21 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

representative_read_entity_type

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
get_entity_type_by_id	Account ID: `bf5a9ef5-dc3b-43cf-a291-6210c0321eba`	$$8.10 \mathrm{ms} \pm 49.5 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.025 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

representative_read_multiple_entities

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=0	0	$$55.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 421 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}3.41 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=255	1,resolve_depths=inherit:1;values:255;properties:255;links:127;link_dests:126;type:true	$$108 \mathrm{ms} \pm 597 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.46 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:0;link_dests:0;type:false	$$61.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 452 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.95 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$71.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 595 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.98 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$79.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 466 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.16 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:2;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$86.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 555 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.41 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=0	0	$$44.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 303 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.233 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=255	1,resolve_depths=inherit:1;values:255;properties:255;links:127;link_dests:126;type:true	$$72.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 419 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.518 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:0;link_dests:0;type:false	$$50.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 308 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.543 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$59.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 453 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.403 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$62.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 506 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.426 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:2;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$62.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 465 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.013 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$

scenarios

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
full_test	query-limited	$$119 \mathrm{ms} \pm 732 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}4.27 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
full_test	query-unlimited	$$129 \mathrm{ms} \pm 664 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.51 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
linked_queries	query-limited	$$22.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 166 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.076 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
linked_queries	query-unlimited	$$504 \mathrm{ms} \pm 1.14 \mathrm{ms}\left({\color{gray}0.494 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

Add the initial problematic crate

53aa3aa

github-actions Bot added area/deps Relates to third-party dependencies (area) area/infra Relates to version control, CI, CD or IaC (area) area/libs Relates to first-party libraries/crates/packages (area) area/tests New or updated tests type/legal Owned by the @legal team labels Sep 11, 2026

TimDiekmann self-assigned this Sep 11, 2026

TimDiekmann deployed to pull-request September 11, 2026 15:39 — with GitHub Actions Active

vercel Bot deployed to Preview – hashdotdesign-tokens September 11, 2026 15:40 View deployment

vercel Bot deployed to Preview – petrinaut-docs September 11, 2026 15:42 View deployment

vercel Bot deployed to Preview – petrinaut September 11, 2026 15:43 View deployment

vercel Bot deployed to Preview – hash September 11, 2026 15:56 View deployment

vilkinsons previously approved these changes Sep 11, 2026

View reviewed changes

Validate problem extensions and support borrowed details

b4113f7

TimDiekmann dismissed vilkinsons’s stale review via b4113f7 September 11, 2026 16:30

vercel Bot temporarily deployed to Preview – petrinaut-docs September 11, 2026 16:30 Inactive

vercel Bot temporarily deployed to Preview – petrinaut September 11, 2026 16:30 Inactive

TimDiekmann deployed to pull-request September 11, 2026 16:31 — with GitHub Actions Active

Set version to 0.0.0

0ef5f68

TimDiekmann deployed to pull-request September 12, 2026 12:51 — with GitHub Actions Active

vercel Bot deployed to Preview – hashdotdesign-tokens September 12, 2026 12:53 View deployment

vercel Bot deployed to Preview – petrinaut September 12, 2026 12:54 View deployment

vercel Bot deployed to Preview – petrinaut-docs September 12, 2026 12:55 View deployment

vercel Bot deployed to Preview – hash September 12, 2026 13:05 View deployment

Use one lifetime for problem details

0a39b46

vercel Bot temporarily deployed to Preview – petrinaut September 12, 2026 13:07 Inactive

vercel Bot temporarily deployed to Preview – petrinaut-docs September 12, 2026 13:07 Inactive

TimDiekmann deployed to pull-request September 12, 2026 13:09 — with GitHub Actions Active

Navigation Menu

Uh oh!

BE-853: Add the initial `problematic` crate - #9683

BE-853: Add the initial `problematic` crate#9683
TimDiekmann wants to merge 4 commits into
mainfrom
t/be-853-add-the-initial-problematic-crate

TimDiekmann commented Sep 11, 2026 •

edited

Loading

Uh oh!

vercel Bot commented Sep 11, 2026 •

edited

Loading

Uh oh!

github-advanced-security AI commented Sep 11, 2026

Uh oh!

codecov Bot commented Sep 11, 2026 •

edited

Loading

Uh oh!

codspeed-hq Bot commented Sep 11, 2026 •

edited

Loading

Uh oh!

github-actions Bot commented Sep 11, 2026

@rust/hash-graph-benches – Integrations

policy_resolution_large

policy_resolution_medium

policy_resolution_none

policy_resolution_small

read_scaling_complete

read_scaling_linkless

representative_read_entity

representative_read_entity_type

representative_read_multiple_entities

scenarios

Uh oh!

Reviewers

Assignees

Labels

Milestone

Development

Uh oh!

3 participants

Uh oh!

Conversation

TimDiekmann commented Sep 11, 2026 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

🌟 What is the purpose of this PR?

🔗 Related links

🚫 Blocked by

🔍 What does this change?

Pre-Merge Checklist 🚀

🚢 Has this modified a publishable library?

📜 Does this require a change to the docs?

🕸️ Does this require a change to the Turbo Graph?

⚠️ Known issues

🐾 Next steps

🛡 What tests cover this?

❓ How to test this?

📹 Demo

Uh oh!

vercel Bot commented Sep 11, 2026 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

github-advanced-security AI commented Sep 11, 2026

What Enabling Code Scanning Means:

Uh oh!

codecov Bot commented Sep 11, 2026 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Codecov Report

Uh oh!

codspeed-hq Bot commented Sep 11, 2026 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Merging this PR will not alter performance

Performance Changes

Footnotes

Uh oh!

github-actions Bot commented Sep 11, 2026

Benchmark results

@rust/hash-graph-benches – Integrations

policy_resolution_large

policy_resolution_medium

policy_resolution_none

policy_resolution_small

read_scaling_complete

read_scaling_linkless

representative_read_entity

representative_read_entity_type

representative_read_multiple_entities

scenarios

Uh oh!

Reviewers

Assignees

Labels

Milestone

Development

Uh oh!

3 participants

TimDiekmann commented Sep 11, 2026 •

edited

Loading

vercel Bot commented Sep 11, 2026 •

edited

Loading

codecov Bot commented Sep 11, 2026 •

edited

Loading

codspeed-hq Bot commented Sep 11, 2026 •

edited

Loading