Update Rust crate annotate-snippets to v0.12.13 - autoclosed

[hash-worker]

This PR contains the following updates:

Package	Type	Update	Change
annotate-snippets	workspace.dependencies	patch	0.12.11 -> 0.12.13

---

Warning

Some dependencies could not be looked up. Check the Dependency Dashboard for more information.

---

Release Notes

rust-lang/annotate-snippets-rs (annotate-snippets)

v0.12.13

Compare Source

Fixed

• Correctly handle tabs on the first and last lines of multiline Patch #​373 and #​380

v0.12.12

Compare Source

Added

• Add no_std support #​365

---

Configuration

📅 Schedule: Branch creation - "before 4am every weekday,every weekend" (UTC), Automerge - At any time (no schedule defined).

🚦 Automerge: Enabled.

♻ Rebasing: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about this update again.

---

• If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

---

This PR has been generated by Renovate Bot.

[vercel]

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.

Project	Deployment	Actions	Updated (UTC)
hash	Ready	Preview, Comment	Mar 4, 2026 6:42pm
hashdotdesign	Ready	Preview, Comment	Mar 4, 2026 6:42pm
hashdotdesign-tokens	Ready	Preview, Comment	Mar 4, 2026 6:42pm
petrinaut	Ready	Preview, Comment	Mar 4, 2026 6:42pm

[cursor]

PR Summary

Low Risk
Lockfile-only dependency bump; low risk aside from potential minor changes in diagnostic/snippet formatting from the updated crate.

Overview
Updates the resolved annotate-snippets dependency in Cargo.lock from 0.12.11 to 0.12.13 (checksum refreshed), with no source code changes in this PR.

^{Written by Cursor Bugbot for commit 20a37db. This will update automatically on new commits. Configure here.}

[codspeed-hq]

Merging this PR will not alter performance

✅ 80 untouched benchmarks

---

_{Comparing deps/rs/annotate-snippets-0.x-lockfile (20a37db) with main (4f10c8c)}

[augmentcode]

🤖 Augment PR Summary

Summary: Updates the Rust crate annotate-snippets from v0.12.11 to v0.12.12 (patch release).
Notes: Upstream adds no_std support; this PR appears to only update the lockfile accordingly.

_{🤖 Was this summary useful? React with 👍 or 👎}

[augmentcode]

Review completed. No suggestions at this time.

Comment augment review to trigger a new review at any time.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 62.81%. Comparing base (4f10c8c) to head (20a37db).
⚠️ Report is 21 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #8478   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   62.81%   62.81%           
=======================================
  Files        1310     1310           
  Lines      133344   133344           
  Branches     5510     5510           
=======================================
+ Hits        83756    83757    +1     
+ Misses      48674    48673    -1     
  Partials      914      914           

Flag	Coverage Δ
apps.hash-ai-worker-ts	1.40% <ø> (ø)
apps.hash-api	0.00% <ø> (ø)
blockprotocol.type-system	40.84% <ø> (ø)
local.claude-hooks	0.00% <ø> (ø)
local.harpc-client	51.24% <ø> (ø)
local.hash-graph-sdk	7.73% <ø> (ø)
local.hash-isomorphic-utils	0.00% <ø> (ø)
rust.antsi	0.00% <ø> (ø)
rust.error-stack	90.88% <ø> (ø)
rust.harpc-codec	84.70% <ø> (ø)
rust.harpc-net	96.16% <ø> (+0.01%)	⬆️
rust.harpc-tower	66.80% <ø> (ø)
rust.harpc-types	0.00% <ø> (ø)
rust.harpc-wire-protocol	92.23% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-codec	72.76% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-api	2.85% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-authorization	62.34% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-postgres-store	26.69% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-store	37.88% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-temporal-versioning	47.95% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-types	0.00% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-validation	83.45% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-ast	87.23% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-compiletest	29.69% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-core	82.29% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-diagnostics	72.43% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-eval	69.13% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-hir	89.06% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-mir	92.59% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-syntax-jexpr	94.05% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
• 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

[github-actions]

Benchmark results

@rust/hash-graph-benches – Integrations

policy_resolution_large

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 2002	$$28.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 170 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.652 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.55 \mathrm{ms} \pm 18.4 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.935 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 1001	$$13.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 85.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.83 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: high, policies: 3314	$$46.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 292 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}5.05 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$16.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 119 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}3.28 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: medium, policies: 1526	$$25.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 181 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.55 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 2078	$$29.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 148 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.97 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.82 \mathrm{ms} \pm 19.5 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.988 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 1033	$$14.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 103 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}5.92 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

policy_resolution_medium

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 102	$$3.94 \mathrm{ms} \pm 24.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.878 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.12 \mathrm{ms} \pm 20.5 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.296 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 51	$$3.48 \mathrm{ms} \pm 17.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.706 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: high, policies: 269	$$5.41 \mathrm{ms} \pm 44.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.25 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.69 \mathrm{ms} \pm 18.7 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.118 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: medium, policies: 107	$$4.31 \mathrm{ms} \pm 31.2 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.415 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 133	$$4.60 \mathrm{ms} \pm 26.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.841 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.55 \mathrm{ms} \pm 19.5 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.275 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 63	$$4.19 \mathrm{ms} \pm 23.2 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.790 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

policy_resolution_none

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 2	$$2.83 \mathrm{ms} \pm 13.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.752 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$2.78 \mathrm{ms} \pm 13.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.994 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 1	$$2.89 \mathrm{ms} \pm 12.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.997 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 8	$$3.16 \mathrm{ms} \pm 14.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.850 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$2.99 \mathrm{ms} \pm 14.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.950 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 3	$$3.27 \mathrm{ms} \pm 16.2 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.590 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

policy_resolution_small

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 52	$$3.23 \mathrm{ms} \pm 16.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.214 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$2.90 \mathrm{ms} \pm 10.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.128 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 25	$$3.07 \mathrm{ms} \pm 15.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.250 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: high, policies: 94	$$3.65 \mathrm{ms} \pm 14.7 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.520 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.24 \mathrm{ms} \pm 22.2 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.05 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: medium, policies: 26	$$3.48 \mathrm{ms} \pm 19.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.37 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 66	$$3.62 \mathrm{ms} \pm 22.2 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.149 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.19 \mathrm{ms} \pm 18.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.421 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 29	$$3.48 \mathrm{ms} \pm 15.5 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.814 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

read_scaling_complete

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_id;one_depth	1 entities	$$42.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 159 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.88 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;one_depth	10 entities	$$80.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 369 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.06 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;one_depth	25 entities	$$45.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 194 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.226 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;one_depth	5 entities	$$49.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 280 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.65 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;one_depth	50 entities	$$57.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 327 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.891 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	1 entities	$$44.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 205 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.750 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	10 entities	$$428 \mathrm{ms} \pm 1.14 \mathrm{ms}\left({\color{gray}-0.738 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	25 entities	$$100 \mathrm{ms} \pm 479 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.443 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	5 entities	$$88.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 433 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.277 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	50 entities	$$291 \mathrm{ms} \pm 869 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-10.371 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	1 entities	$$15.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 66.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-3.999 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	10 entities	$$16.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 84.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.470 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	25 entities	$$16.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 65.2 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.244 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	5 entities	$$15.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 66.5 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.662 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	50 entities	$$19.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 105 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.05 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

read_scaling_linkless

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_id	1 entities	$$15.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 78.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.877 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	10 entities	$$15.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 67.4 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.930 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	100 entities	$$15.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 76.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.106 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	1000 entities	$$16.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 98.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.45 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	10000 entities	$$24.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 162 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.527 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

representative_read_entity

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/block/v/1	$$32.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 318 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.87 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/book/v/1	$$30.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 269 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.561 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/building/v/1	$$30.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 253 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-4.846 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/organization/v/1	$$31.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 273 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-3.623 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/page/v/2	$$32.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 307 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.47 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/person/v/1	$$30.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 295 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-4.799 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/playlist/v/1	$$32.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 311 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.069 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/song/v/1	$$30.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 296 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.790 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/uk-address/v/1	$$32.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 298 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}4.61 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

representative_read_entity_type

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
get_entity_type_by_id	Account ID: bf5a9ef5-dc3b-43cf-a291-6210c0321eba	$$8.73 \mathrm{ms} \pm 35.7 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.988 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

representative_read_multiple_entities

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=0	0	$$88.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 489 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.387 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=255	1,resolve_depths=inherit:1;values:255;properties:255;links:127;link_dests:126;type:true	$$142 \mathrm{ms} \pm 574 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.194 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:0;link_dests:0;type:false	$$95.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 380 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.375 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$104 \mathrm{ms} \pm 479 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.542 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$113 \mathrm{ms} \pm 519 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.611 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:2;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$121 \mathrm{ms} \pm 495 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.448 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=0	0	$$86.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 493 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.329 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=255	1,resolve_depths=inherit:1;values:255;properties:255;links:127;link_dests:126;type:true	$$114 \mathrm{ms} \pm 569 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-3.430 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:0;link_dests:0;type:false	$$93.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 506 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.035 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$103 \mathrm{ms} \pm 666 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.414 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$105 \mathrm{ms} \pm 579 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.911 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:2;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$104 \mathrm{ms} \pm 504 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.146 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$

scenarios

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
full_test	query-limited	$$139 \mathrm{ms} \pm 442 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.33 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
full_test	query-unlimited	$$136 \mathrm{ms} \pm 472 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.067 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
linked_queries	query-limited	$$105 \mathrm{ms} \pm 545 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.847 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
linked_queries	query-unlimited	$$579 \mathrm{ms} \pm 961 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.677 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph