Update Rust toolchains to nightly-2026-03-24

[hash-worker]

This PR contains the following updates:

Package	Update	Change
rust	patch	2026-02-09 -> 2026-03-24

---

Warning

Some dependencies could not be looked up. Check the Dependency Dashboard for more information.

---

Configuration

📅 Schedule: Branch creation - "before 11am" (UTC), Automerge - At any time (no schedule defined).

🚦 Automerge: Enabled.

♻ Rebasing: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about this update again.

---

• If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

---

This PR has been generated by Renovate Bot.

[vercel]

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.

Project	Deployment	Actions	Updated (UTC)
hash	Ready	Preview, Comment	Mar 26, 2026 9:03am
petrinaut	Ready	Preview, Comment	Mar 26, 2026 9:03am

2 Skipped Deployments

Project	Deployment	Actions	Updated (UTC)
hashdotdesign	Ignored	Preview	Mar 26, 2026 9:03am
hashdotdesign-tokens	Ignored	Preview	Mar 26, 2026 9:03am

[cursor]

PR Summary

Medium Risk
Medium risk because the toolchain upgrade can change compiler behavior and feature availability, and there are small changes in inlining heuristics floating-point math and error-stack frame capture logic that could affect edge-case behavior.

Overview
Updates the workspace toolchain to nightly-2026-03-24 (including rust-version badges) and removes or narrows several nightly #![feature(...)] gates across crates/tests to match what the new nightly provides.

Makes a handful of small code tweaks to stay compatible with the new toolchain: replaces some floating-point math in HashQL inlining heuristics with mul_add (and adjusts tests to avoid rounding sensitivity), updates error-stack to use Option::is_none_or for backtrace/spantrace capture checks, and adds #[must_use] to hardware-counter constructors; also includes minor formatting cleanups (e.g., trailing commas in panic!/unimplemented!/write!).

^{Written by Cursor Bugbot for commit 1d5a694. This will update automatically on new commits. Configure here.}

[augmentcode]

🤖 Augment PR Summary

Summary: Updates the repo Rust toolchain from nightly-2026-02-09 to nightly-2026-02-16.
Changes: Refreshes the root rust-toolchain.toml and updates the corresponding Rust-version badges in libs/error-stack docs to match.

_{🤖 Was this summary useful? React with 👍 or 👎}

[augmentcode]

Review completed. No suggestions at this time.

Comment augment review to trigger a new review at any time.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

❌ Patch coverage is 94.73684% with 1 line in your changes missing coverage. Please review.
✅ Project coverage is 62.50%. Comparing base (2b84e96) to head (1d5a694).
⚠️ Report is 2 commits behind head on main.

Files with missing lines	Patch %	Lines
libs/@local/harpc/types/src/subsystem.rs	0.00%	1 Missing ⚠️

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #8448   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   62.49%   62.50%           
=======================================
  Files        1318     1318           
  Lines      134210   134222   +12     
  Branches     5517     5517           
=======================================
+ Hits        83876    83895   +19     
+ Misses      49419    49412    -7     
  Partials      915      915           

Flag	Coverage Δ
apps.hash-ai-worker-ts	1.40% <ø> (ø)
apps.hash-api	0.00% <ø> (ø)
blockprotocol.type-system	40.84% <ø> (ø)
local.claude-hooks	0.00% <ø> (ø)
local.harpc-client	51.24% <ø> (ø)
local.hash-graph-sdk	9.63% <ø> (ø)
local.hash-isomorphic-utils	0.00% <ø> (ø)
rust.antsi	0.00% <ø> (ø)
rust.error-stack	90.87% <100.00%> (-0.01%)	⬇️
rust.harpc-codec	84.70% <ø> (ø)
rust.harpc-net	96.21% <ø> (+0.06%)	⬆️
rust.harpc-tower	67.03% <ø> (+0.22%)	⬆️
rust.harpc-types	0.00% <0.00%> (ø)
rust.harpc-wire-protocol	92.23% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-codec	72.76% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-api	2.52% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-authorization	62.34% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-postgres-store	26.39% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-store	37.76% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-temporal-versioning	47.95% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-types	0.00% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-validation	83.45% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-ast	87.23% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-compiletest	29.69% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-core	82.29% <100.00%> (ø)
rust.hashql-diagnostics	72.43% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-eval	69.13% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-hir	89.06% <ø> (-0.01%)	⬇️
rust.hashql-mir	92.64% <100.00%> (-0.01%)	⬇️
rust.hashql-syntax-jexpr	94.05% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
• 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

[codspeed-hq]

Merging this PR will degrade performance by 19.34%

⚡ 1 improved benchmark
❌ 1 (👁 1) regressed benchmark
✅ 78 untouched benchmarks

Performance Changes

	Benchmark	BASE	HEAD	Efficiency
👁	pattern_match_constant	121.7 ns	150.8 ns	-19.34%
⚡	type_checker_simulation	539.4 ns	462.5 ns	+16.64%

---

_{Comparing deps/rs/rust-toolchains (1d5a694) with main (2b84e96)}

[hash-worker]

Edited/Blocked Notification

Renovate will not automatically rebase this PR, because it does not recognize the last commit author and assumes somebody else may have edited the PR.

You can manually request rebase by checking the rebase/retry box above.

⚠️ Warning: custom changes will be lost.

Your organization requires reapproval when changes are made, so Graphite has dismissed approvals. See the output of git range-diff at https://github.com/hashintel/hash/actions/runs/23559549958

[indietyp]

• Update Rust toolchains to nightly-2026-03-24 #8448 👈 (View in Graphite)
• main

This stack of pull requests is managed by Graphite. Learn more about stacking.

[github-actions]

Benchmark results

@rust/hash-graph-benches – Integrations

policy_resolution_large

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 2002	$$32.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 173 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}7.48 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$4.10 \mathrm{ms} \pm 25.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}5.63 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 1001	$$16.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 81.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}5.52 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: high, policies: 3314	$$48.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 383 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.429 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$17.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 148 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-4.098 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: medium, policies: 1526	$$28.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 215 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.352 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 2078	$$31.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 178 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.66 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$4.36 \mathrm{ms} \pm 25.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.447 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 1033	$$16.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 114 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}3.99 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

policy_resolution_medium

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 102	$$4.20 \mathrm{ms} \pm 25.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.605 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.25 \mathrm{ms} \pm 16.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.538 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 51	$$3.65 \mathrm{ms} \pm 23.7 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-4.090 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: high, policies: 269	$$5.96 \mathrm{ms} \pm 38.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}3.75 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$4.12 \mathrm{ms} \pm 29.2 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}4.89 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: medium, policies: 107	$$4.60 \mathrm{ms} \pm 27.5 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.848 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 133	$$4.92 \mathrm{ms} \pm 24.4 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.115 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.90 \mathrm{ms} \pm 23.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}4.35 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 63	$$4.56 \mathrm{ms} \pm 30.5 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.21 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

policy_resolution_none

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 2	$$2.92 \mathrm{ms} \pm 14.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-3.406 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$2.94 \mathrm{ms} \pm 19.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.223 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 1	$$3.00 \mathrm{ms} \pm 15.4 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.794 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 8	$$3.26 \mathrm{ms} \pm 18.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-3.492 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.08 \mathrm{ms} \pm 15.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.948 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 3	$$3.44 \mathrm{ms} \pm 19.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.13 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

policy_resolution_small

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 52	$$3.58 \mathrm{ms} \pm 25.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}8.01 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.06 \mathrm{ms} \pm 18.7 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.35 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 25	$$3.28 \mathrm{ms} \pm 21.2 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}3.19 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: high, policies: 94	$$3.88 \mathrm{ms} \pm 18.7 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.63 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.36 \mathrm{ms} \pm 18.5 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.40 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: medium, policies: 26	$$3.61 \mathrm{ms} \pm 21.4 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.25 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 66	$$3.74 \mathrm{ms} \pm 24.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.67 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.46 \mathrm{ms} \pm 25.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}6.27 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 29	$$3.67 \mathrm{ms} \pm 22.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}4.07 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

read_scaling_complete

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_id;one_depth	1 entities	$$50.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 264 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.24 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;one_depth	10 entities	$$91.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 519 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.431 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;one_depth	25 entities	$$56.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 405 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.75 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;one_depth	5 entities	$$57.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 331 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.946 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;one_depth	50 entities	$$71.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 485 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}6.51 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	1 entities	$$51.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 267 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.026 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	10 entities	$$442 \mathrm{ms} \pm 956 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}3.07 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	25 entities	$$114 \mathrm{ms} \pm 511 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.14 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	5 entities	$$98.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 405 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.14 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	50 entities	$$315 \mathrm{ms} \pm 891 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-8.693 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	1 entities	$$21.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 130 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.315 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	10 entities	$$22.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 111 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.37 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	25 entities	$$22.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 122 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.191 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	5 entities	$$22.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 104 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.67 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	50 entities	$$25.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 231 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-6.151 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

read_scaling_linkless

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_id	1 entities	$$21.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 134 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.86 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	10 entities	$$21.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 119 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.545 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	100 entities	$$22.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 99.4 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.71 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	1000 entities	$$22.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 147 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}3.27 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	10000 entities	$$29.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 220 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.642 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

representative_read_entity

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/block/v/1	$$37.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 372 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.287 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/book/v/1	$$38.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 291 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.866 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/building/v/1	$$38.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 315 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}6.13 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/organization/v/1	$$37.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 286 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-3.119 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/page/v/2	$$36.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 317 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-5.406 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/person/v/1	$$38.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 312 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.275 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/playlist/v/1	$$38.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 386 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.48 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/song/v/1	$$37.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 358 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.115 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/uk-address/v/1	$$37.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 370 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.63 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

representative_read_entity_type

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
get_entity_type_by_id	Account ID: bf5a9ef5-dc3b-43cf-a291-6210c0321eba	$$9.33 \mathrm{ms} \pm 58.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}3.55 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

representative_read_multiple_entities

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=0	0	$$111 \mathrm{ms} \pm 592 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}9.08 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=255	1,resolve_depths=inherit:1;values:255;properties:255;links:127;link_dests:126;type:true	$$168 \mathrm{ms} \pm 718 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}4.49 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:0;link_dests:0;type:false	$$117 \mathrm{ms} \pm 557 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}6.58 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$125 \mathrm{ms} \pm 549 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}4.02 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$140 \mathrm{ms} \pm 571 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}4.80 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:2;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$147 \mathrm{ms} \pm 666 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}3.90 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=0	0	$$114 \mathrm{ms} \pm 611 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}4.16 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=255	1,resolve_depths=inherit:1;values:255;properties:255;links:127;link_dests:126;type:true	$$147 \mathrm{ms} \pm 607 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}3.52 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:0;link_dests:0;type:false	$$123 \mathrm{ms} \pm 558 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}5.57 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$130 \mathrm{ms} \pm 533 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.77 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$133 \mathrm{ms} \pm 596 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}3.01 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:2;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$136 \mathrm{ms} \pm 485 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}5.02 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$

scenarios

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
full_test	query-limited	$$139 \mathrm{ms} \pm 567 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.15 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
full_test	query-unlimited	$$150 \mathrm{ms} \pm 589 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.45 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
linked_queries	query-limited	$$111 \mathrm{ms} \pm 670 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.450 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
linked_queries	query-unlimited	$$576 \mathrm{ms} \pm 2.89 \mathrm{ms}\left({\color{gray}-1.193 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph