Skip to content

Update @github/copilot to 1.0.81-5 - #2364

Merged
stephentoub merged 7 commits into
mainfrom
update-copilot-1.0.81-5
Aug 20, 2026
Merged

Update @github/copilot to 1.0.81-5#2364
stephentoub merged 7 commits into
mainfrom
update-copilot-1.0.81-5

Conversation

@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Automated update of @github/copilot to version 1.0.81-5.

Changes

  • Updated @github/copilot in nodejs/package.json and test/harness/package.json
  • Re-ran all code generators (scripts/codegen)
  • Formatted generated output
  • Updated Java codegen dependency, POM property, and regenerated Java types

Java Handwritten Code Adaptation Plan

If java-sdk-tests CI fails on this PR, follow these steps:

  1. Identify failures: Run mvn clean, mvn verify from java/ locally or check the java-sdk-tests workflow run logs.
  2. Categorize errors:
    • Constructor signature changes (new fields added to generated records)
    • Enum value additions/renames in generated types
    • New event types requiring handler registration
    • Removed or renamed generated types
  3. Fix handwritten source (java/sdk/src/main/java/com/github/copilot/sdk/):
    • Update call sites passing positional constructor args to include new fields (typically null for optional new fields).
    • Update switch/if-else over enum values to handle new cases.
    • Register handlers for new event types in CopilotSession.java if applicable.
  4. Fix handwritten tests (java/sdk/src/test/java/com/github/copilot/sdk/):
    • Same constructor/enum fixes as above.
    • Add new test methods for new functionality if the change adds user-facing API surface.
  5. Validate: cd java && mvn clean test-compile jar:jar && mvn verify -Dskip.test.harness=true
  6. Format: cd java && mvn spotless:apply
  7. Push fixes to this PR branch.

To automate this, trigger the java-adapt-handwritten-code-to-accept-upgrade-changes agentic workflow instead.

Next steps

When ready, click Ready for review to trigger CI checks.

Created by the Update @github/copilot Dependency workflow.

- Updated nodejs and test harness dependencies
- Re-ran code generators
- Formatted generated code
@stephentoub
stephentoub marked this pull request as ready for review August 20, 2026 01:41
@stephentoub
stephentoub requested a review from a team as a code owner August 20, 2026 01:41
Copilot AI balanced review requested due to automatic review settings August 20, 2026 01:41
@github-actions github-actions Bot mentioned this pull request Aug 20, 2026

Copilot AI left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull request overview

Updates the Copilot CLI runtime dependency from 1.0.81-4 to 1.0.81-5.

Changes:

  • Updates Node.js, test harness, and Java codegen dependencies.
  • Refreshes lockfiles and platform-specific package integrity hashes.
  • Synchronizes the Java runtime version marker.
Show a summary per file
File Description
java/pom.xml Updates the runtime version marker.
java/scripts/codegen/package.json Updates the codegen dependency.
java/scripts/codegen/package-lock.json Locks updated runtime artifacts.
nodejs/package.json Updates the SDK runtime dependency.
nodejs/package-lock.json Locks updated runtime artifacts.
nodejs/samples/package-lock.json Synchronizes the linked SDK dependency.
test/harness/package.json Updates the harness runtime dependency.
test/harness/package-lock.json Locks updated harness artifacts.

Review details

💡 Add a code-review agent skill or configure MCP servers for context-aware, tailored reviews. Learn more in the docs.

Files not reviewed (4)
  • java/scripts/codegen/package-lock.json: Generated file
  • nodejs/package-lock.json: Generated file
  • nodejs/samples/package-lock.json: Generated file
  • test/harness/package-lock.json: Generated file
  • Files reviewed: 4/8 changed files
  • Comments generated: 0
  • Review effort level: Balanced

Co-authored-by: Copilot App <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
@github-actions

This comment has been minimized.

stephentoub and others added 4 commits August 19, 2026 22:20
Co-authored-by: Copilot App <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Copilot App <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>

Copilot-Session: 4e94289c-90c8-4664-a878-056539754908
Co-authored-by: Copilot App <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>

Copilot-Session: 4e94289c-90c8-4664-a878-056539754908
Co-authored-by: Copilot App <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>

Copilot-Session: 4e94289c-90c8-4664-a878-056539754908
@github-actions

This comment has been minimized.

Co-authored-by: Copilot App <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>

Copilot-Session: 4e94289c-90c8-4664-a878-056539754908
@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Cross-SDK Consistency Review ✅

This PR updates @github/copilot to 1.0.81-5 and consistently bumps the TODO/skip comments in the rpc_ui_ephemeral_query E2E tests across all five SDKs that implement them (Node.js, Python, Go, .NET, Rust). The comment changes are uniform — all reference the same regression and the same CLI version.

Pre-existing gap (not introduced by this PR): Java does not have a RpcUiEphemeralQuery E2E test while the other SDKs do. This gap existed before this PR and is out of scope for this change. A follow-up to add RpcUiEphemeralQueryE2ETest to java/sdk/src/test/java/com/github/copilot/ (with a similar skip annotation while the regression persists) would bring Java into parity.

No cross-SDK consistency issues introduced by this PR.

Generated by SDK Consistency Review Agent for #2364 · sonnet46 29 AIC · ⌖ 5.36 AIC · ⊞ 6.6K ·

@stephentoub
stephentoub added this pull request to the merge queue Aug 20, 2026
@stephentoub
stephentoub removed this pull request from the merge queue due to a manual request Aug 20, 2026
@stephentoub
stephentoub merged commit 23dcc2e into main Aug 20, 2026
69 checks passed
@stephentoub
stephentoub deleted the update-copilot-1.0.81-5 branch August 20, 2026 09:55
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants