-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2.1k
feat: add Apple App Store Reviewer prompt #584
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
- 📝 New prompt for auditing iOS app code and metadata - 🔍 Identifies rejection risks and optimization opportunities - 📋 Provides structured recommendations for App Store compliance
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Pull request overview
This pull request adds a new prompt file for reviewing iOS app codebases from an Apple App Store reviewer's perspective. The prompt serves as an agent that identifies potential rejection risks and optimization opportunities for App Store submissions.
Changes:
- Added a comprehensive Apple App Store reviewer prompt file with detailed review methodology
- Updated the prompts documentation to include the new Apple App Store Reviewer entry
Reviewed changes
Copilot reviewed 2 out of 2 changed files in this pull request and generated 3 comments.
| File | Description |
|---|---|
| prompts/apple-appstore-reviewer.prompt.md | New agent prompt providing comprehensive App Store review guidance including compliance checks, risk assessment, and structured output requirements |
| docs/README.prompts.md | Added documentation entry for the new Apple App Store Reviewer prompt |
Comments suppressed due to low confidence (1)
prompts/apple-appstore-reviewer.prompt.md:5
- According to the prompt file guide coding guidelines, the prompt should strongly encourage the use of a
modelfield to specify the model that the prompt is optimized for. Consider adding a model specification such asmodel: 'gpt-4.1'ormodel: 'claude-sonnet-4.5'based on which model this complex review task is optimized for.
agent: "agent"
name: "Apple App Store Reviewer"
tools: ["vscode", "execute", "read", "search", "web", "upstash/context7/*", "agent", "todo"]
description: "Serves as a reviewer of the codebase with instructions on looking for Apple App Store optimizations or rejection reasons."
| agent: "agent" | ||
| name: "Apple App Store Reviewer" | ||
| tools: ["vscode", "execute", "read", "search", "web", "upstash/context7/*", "agent", "todo"] | ||
| description: "Serves as a reviewer of the codebase with instructions on looking for Apple App Store optimizations or rejection reasons." |
Copilot
AI
Jan 16, 2026
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
According to the prompt file guide coding guidelines, prompt files should have a mode field specified of either agent or ask. However, this file uses an agent field instead. While some other prompts in the repository also use agent instead of mode, the coding guidelines explicitly require mode. The name field is also non-standard for .prompt.md files, as most prompt files don't include this field in the front matter.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The guidelines are out of date. agent is the correct way that VSC reads these now and name is valid.
| agent: "agent" | ||
| name: "Apple App Store Reviewer" | ||
| tools: ["vscode", "execute", "read", "search", "web", "upstash/context7/*", "agent", "todo"] | ||
| description: "Serves as a reviewer of the codebase with instructions on looking for Apple App Store optimizations or rejection reasons." |
Copilot
AI
Jan 16, 2026
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
According to the prompt file guide coding guidelines, the description field value should be wrapped in single quotes, not double quotes. Change the description to use single quotes for consistency with the established pattern.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This seems incorrect
Co-authored-by: Copilot <[email protected]>
Pull Request Checklist
npm startand verified thatREADME.mdis up to date.Description
This is a prompt that will run in agent mode and serve as an Apple App Store reviewer assistent, reviewing the codebase for areas to focus on for successful App Store submissions.
Type of Contribution
Additional Notes
By submitting this pull request, I confirm that my contribution abides by the Code of Conduct and will be licensed under the MIT License.