Skip to content

Conversation

@timheuer
Copy link

  • 📝 New prompt for auditing iOS app code and metadata
  • 🔍 Identifies rejection risks and optimization opportunities
  • 📋 Provides structured recommendations for App Store compliance

Pull Request Checklist

  • I have read and followed the CONTRIBUTING.md guidelines.
  • My contribution adds a new prompt file in the correct directory.
  • The file follows the required naming convention.
  • The content is clearly structured and follows the example format.
  • I have tested my instructions, prompt, or chat mode with GitHub Copilot.
  • I have run npm start and verified that README.md is up to date.

Description

This is a prompt that will run in agent mode and serve as an Apple App Store reviewer assistent, reviewing the codebase for areas to focus on for successful App Store submissions.


Type of Contribution

  • New instruction file.
  • New prompt file.
  • New chat mode file.
  • New collection file.
  • New skill file.
  • Update to existing instruction, prompt, chat mode, collection or skill.
  • Other (please specify):

Additional Notes


By submitting this pull request, I confirm that my contribution abides by the Code of Conduct and will be licensed under the MIT License.

- 📝 New prompt for auditing iOS app code and metadata
- 🔍 Identifies rejection risks and optimization opportunities
- 📋 Provides structured recommendations for App Store compliance
Copilot AI review requested due to automatic review settings January 16, 2026 18:22
Copy link
Contributor

Copilot AI left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull request overview

This pull request adds a new prompt file for reviewing iOS app codebases from an Apple App Store reviewer's perspective. The prompt serves as an agent that identifies potential rejection risks and optimization opportunities for App Store submissions.

Changes:

  • Added a comprehensive Apple App Store reviewer prompt file with detailed review methodology
  • Updated the prompts documentation to include the new Apple App Store Reviewer entry

Reviewed changes

Copilot reviewed 2 out of 2 changed files in this pull request and generated 3 comments.

File Description
prompts/apple-appstore-reviewer.prompt.md New agent prompt providing comprehensive App Store review guidance including compliance checks, risk assessment, and structured output requirements
docs/README.prompts.md Added documentation entry for the new Apple App Store Reviewer prompt
Comments suppressed due to low confidence (1)

prompts/apple-appstore-reviewer.prompt.md:5

  • According to the prompt file guide coding guidelines, the prompt should strongly encourage the use of a model field to specify the model that the prompt is optimized for. Consider adding a model specification such as model: 'gpt-4.1' or model: 'claude-sonnet-4.5' based on which model this complex review task is optimized for.
agent: "agent"
name: "Apple App Store Reviewer"
tools: ["vscode", "execute", "read", "search", "web", "upstash/context7/*", "agent", "todo"]
description: "Serves as a reviewer of the codebase with instructions on looking for Apple App Store optimizations or rejection reasons."

Comment on lines +2 to +5
agent: "agent"
name: "Apple App Store Reviewer"
tools: ["vscode", "execute", "read", "search", "web", "upstash/context7/*", "agent", "todo"]
description: "Serves as a reviewer of the codebase with instructions on looking for Apple App Store optimizations or rejection reasons."
Copy link

Copilot AI Jan 16, 2026

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

According to the prompt file guide coding guidelines, prompt files should have a mode field specified of either agent or ask. However, this file uses an agent field instead. While some other prompts in the repository also use agent instead of mode, the coding guidelines explicitly require mode. The name field is also non-standard for .prompt.md files, as most prompt files don't include this field in the front matter.

Copilot generated this review using guidance from repository custom instructions.
Copy link
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The guidelines are out of date. agent is the correct way that VSC reads these now and name is valid.

agent: "agent"
name: "Apple App Store Reviewer"
tools: ["vscode", "execute", "read", "search", "web", "upstash/context7/*", "agent", "todo"]
description: "Serves as a reviewer of the codebase with instructions on looking for Apple App Store optimizations or rejection reasons."
Copy link

Copilot AI Jan 16, 2026

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

According to the prompt file guide coding guidelines, the description field value should be wrapped in single quotes, not double quotes. Change the description to use single quotes for consistency with the established pattern.

Copilot generated this review using guidance from repository custom instructions.
Copy link
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This seems incorrect

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant