Skip to content

Add a default constructor to TaggedUnion; resolves #608#612

Merged
liuzicheng1987 merged 1 commit intomainfrom
f/tagged_union_default_constructor
Feb 13, 2026
Merged

Add a default constructor to TaggedUnion; resolves #608#612
liuzicheng1987 merged 1 commit intomainfrom
f/tagged_union_default_constructor

Conversation

@liuzicheng1987
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

@gemini-code-assist
Copy link

Summary of Changes

Hello @liuzicheng1987, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request introduces a default constructor to the TaggedUnion struct. This enhancement allows for the default initialization of TaggedUnion instances, which simplifies its instantiation and integration into other data structures or classes that require default constructibility. The change directly resolves a reported issue, improving the usability and flexibility of the TaggedUnion type.

Highlights

Changelog
  • include/rfl/TaggedUnion.hpp
    • Added a default constructor TaggedUnion() = default; to the struct.
Activity
  • No human activity has been recorded for this pull request yet.
Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands on the current page.

Feature Command Description
Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in pull request comments and review comments.
Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

  1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution.

Copy link

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request introduces a default constructor for the rfl::TaggedUnion class template. The implementation uses = default, which correctly leverages the default constructor of the underlying rfl::Variant member. This change allows rfl::TaggedUnion instances to be default-constructed, initializing them with a default-constructed value of the first alternative type, which is consistent with the behavior of std::variant. The change is simple, effective, and I found no issues with it.

@liuzicheng1987 liuzicheng1987 merged commit c2ab61a into main Feb 13, 2026
321 of 322 checks passed
@liuzicheng1987 liuzicheng1987 deleted the f/tagged_union_default_constructor branch February 13, 2026 05:02
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant