Skip to content

probe: docs-only fast path check (throwaway, will be closed) - #4164

Closed
erikdarlingdata wants to merge 2 commits into
devfrom
ci/docs-skip-ci-probe
Closed

erikdarlingdata wants to merge 2 commits into
devfrom
ci/docs-skip-ci-probe

Conversation

@erikdarlingdata

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

Throwaway probe for #4163: a one-line README.md edit to prove the docs fast path engages, all required checks report success, and measure job times. Never merge this; it will be closed after its checks are read.

- Add llms.txt (the exact root path, not **/*.txt) to the docs allowlist.
- Remove README.md and Lite/README.md from the lite and lite_shard filters
  (kept byte-equal by CrossAppGuardCiGateTests), so a README-only PR no
  longer runs the Lite suite. LiteRuntimePrerequisiteDocsTests now runs
  on every code PR and in the nightly instead.
- darling-tree-guards no longer runs the whole Darling suite when the
  build job's own classify step engaged the docs fast path; the build
  job now publishes that decision as a job output (docs-fastpath)
  alongside its existing darling-tests outcome output.
- push and merge_group no longer force the restore back on for a
  docs-only change: nothing that restore validates (lock files,
  Directory.Packages.props, global.json) is reachable from a change
  that is entirely on the docs allowlist, since all of those sit on
  the root filter which vetoes the fast path.
@erikdarlingdata
erikdarlingdata changed the base branch from ci/docs-skip-ci to dev September 24, 2026 11:30
@erikdarlingdata

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner Author

Closing the probe unmerged. Retargeted to dev, it carries #4163's build.yml change, so it isn't docs-only and can't test the fast path. The probe runs after #4163 merges: a README-only PR against dev.

@erikdarlingdata
erikdarlingdata deleted the ci/docs-skip-ci-probe branch September 24, 2026 11:38
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant