Skip to content

Conversation

@hamogu
Copy link
Member

@hamogu hamogu commented Jan 21, 2026

I think it's not (or at least no longer) accurate to describe the maintainer of the core packages as the "coordination committee". We have a larger number of maintainers for the core package that are not the the Coco, ad reversely, we have had (or cna have in the future) Coco members who are not maintainers of the code package.

Alternative wordings could be "core maintainers", but that's too self-refential as for an entry in "core package - maintainers", or it could be a link to the roles page, but I don't think it's worth setting that up here.

So, I suggest just this minimal change.

Found in #699

I think it's not (or at least no longer) accurate to describe the maintainer of the core packages as the "coordination committee". We have a larger number of maintainers for the core package that are not the the Coco, ad reversely, we have had (or cna have in the future) Coco members who are not maintainers of the code package.

Alternate wordings could be "core maintainers", but that's too self-refential as for an entry in "core package - maintainers", or it could be a link to the roles page, but I don't think it's worth setting that up here.

So, I suggest just this minimal change.
{
"name": "astropy core package",
"maintainer": "Astropy Coordination Committee",
"maintainer": "Astropy Maintainer Community",
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Should we just copy from the official citation file at https://github.com/astropy/astropy/blob/711c366c09990896b710c45c851c4ce3b5c9bccc/CITATION.cff#L11 ?

Suggested change
"maintainer": "Astropy Maintainer Community",
"maintainer": "Astropy Collaboration",

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

If that's in the official reference, makes sense – though Maintainer Community sounds more accurate to me, as not all contributors have maintainer rights or tasks.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants