HIVE-29262: [Addendum] Fix VectorPTFGroupBatches partition key copy when partition and order columns overlap#6597
Open
Aggarwal-Raghav wants to merge 1 commit into
Open
Conversation
…hen partition and order columns overlap
|
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.



What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This addendum provides a better fix in my opinion for the original issue and another issue i.e.
ClassCastExceptioninVectorPTFGroupBatcheswhen partition and order columns overlap, replacing the original approach taken in #6512Check the discussion here: #6512 (comment)
Why are the changes needed?
This PR, is also fixing 1 additional issue of
ClassCastExceptionwhen there is overlap column in partition by and order by clause. I observed the below stacktrace on Hive 4.0.1 after debugging I found this PR is fixing it as well.Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
NO
How was this patch tested?
Wrote a new q file and original q file introduced in older approach is also passing.