-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 19
Feature: integrate pycirclize into UltraPlot #495
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
Codecov Report❌ Patch coverage is 📢 Thoughts on this report? Let us know! |
c1d12fb to
e0a3d1c
Compare
|
Opening this up for review. The new layout is still not stabilizing enough or the CI are too strict. The failing tests are on differences that are not caused by the code introduced here (as it is additive). |
ultraplot/axes/plot.py
Outdated
| Whether to show radial grid labels. | ||
| grid_interval_ratio : float or None, optional | ||
| Grid interval ratio (0 to 1). | ||
| grid_line_kws, grid_label_kws : dict-like, optional |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'd like to bring this to your attention. In ultraplot, we use a lot of _kw, like abc_kw, title_kw, rc_kw, norm_kw, which is efficient, unified, and reduces keystrokes. For these kws here, should we maintain consistency with the ultraplot style or with the pyCirclize style?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Think you are right
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I will also move the defaults to RC while I am at it
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I really admire your efficiency. Since you're already tinkering with defaults and RC, when creating plots, there's a warning message: UltraPlotWarning: Tick label sharing not implemented for <class 'ultraplot.axes.polar.PolarAxes'> subplots. It's fine with me, and no big deal. But if you'd like take a look, maybe turn tick label sharing default to off if it's not support, and warn if users manually turn it on? If it will not complicate other thing.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
That warning is correct, to avoid it explicitly set sharing to 0. Sharing polar axes does not make sense for multiple subplots -- we may want to add a surpress flag in case it gets annoying
beckermr
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Let's change kws to kw even in internal functions. Also, defaults should be in the RC.
This PR will integrated pycirclize into UltraPlot exposing chord diagrams, radar plots, and phylogeny plot. It wraps PyCirclize into an UltraPlot flavored manner adding the convenience of normal plotting while harnessing the strenghts of this well developed package.
Putting this in draft for now but it seems to work nicely with main
Closes #472