docs: surface donations and credit contributors on the org page - #3
Conversation
The donation addresses were a plain bullet list near the bottom, easy to scroll past. Same content, now a centred block that reads as an ask rather than a footnote — matching edge's README and the landing page. Also adds a contributors strip. Worth crediting explicitly: most of the value came from people wearing it on a real wrist and reporting what came out wrong, which matters more than usual here because there is exactly one person's physiology in the test data otherwise.
|
Warning Review limit reached
Next review available in: 59 minutes Enable usage-based reviews in Billing to review now. Otherwise, wait until the next included review is available. How can I continue?After more reviews become available, a review can be triggered using the To avoid repeated limits, reduce automatic review volume by pausing incremental auto-reviews earlier, using label-based review opt-in, excluding WIP or generated PR titles, or requesting reviews manually when the PR is ready. If your team needs uninterrupted high-volume reviews, an organization admin can enable usage-based reviews. How do review limits work?CodeRabbit enforces per-developer PR review limits for each organization. Most developers receive the normal plan review availability. For paid Pro and Pro+ PR reviews, CodeRabbit uses adaptive limits for sustained high-volume activity. When a developer's recent PR review activity reaches the 95th percentile or higher among CodeRabbit users, additional reviews become available more gradually as earlier reviews age out of the rolling window. Please refer docs for additional details. ✨ Finishing Touches🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Comment |
1 participant
Third in the set with OpenStrap/edge#155 (which has the full reasoning), OpenStrap/protocol#18 and OpenStrap/analytics#29. Stacks on top of #2.
The donation addresses were a plain bullet list near the bottom of the org profile — easy to scroll straight past. Same content, now a centred block that reads as an ask rather than a footnote, consistent with edge's README and the landing page.
Adds a contributors strip too. Worth crediting explicitly: most of the value here came from people wearing it on a real wrist and reporting what came out wrong — which matters more than usual, because there's exactly one person's physiology in the test data otherwise.
Docs only.