Tip
Talks to Anthropic, OpenAI, Kimi, GLM, Gemini, DeepSeek, xAI, Mistral, OpenRouter, and local Ollama. Ships with 30 built in tools, speaks Model Context Protocol, runs parallel and pipelined subagents, integrates with Language Server Protocol for real code intelligence, compacts its own context, and logs every permission decision to an audit trail.
Built to answer one question: where exactly do coding models break down when you try to use them as real engineers?
| Follow @Aditya-PS-05 on GitHub for more projects. Hacking on AI coding agents, agent infrastructure, and model evaluation tooling. |
|---|
Run
uv pip install -e .and launchcodesm run. You get a fully instrumented coding agent that logs every failure mode, not just the successes.
Codesm uses a compact, full-width transcript with a fixed prompt at the bottom. Tool output stays collapsed by default; press Ctrl+T to inspect the full transcript, including reasoning summaries and specialist activity.
Codesm is a terminal first AI coding agent written in Python. It supports native and OpenAI-compatible providers, exposes a wide tool surface, and runs a ReAct loop that can fan out into parallel subagents or chain them into pipelines.
Codesm combines configurable model routing, specialist agents, and an explicit debugging workflow in one runtime. Use planner, Oracle, librarian, finder, researcher, reviewer, and coder roles with shared project rules and task budgets. The terminal shows which model ran, what it did, and whether the work completed, failed, was cancelled, or remains unverified.
codesm debug "Fix the failing checkout tests" --dir ./project
codesm eval benchmarks/fix-bug-with-tests.yaml \
--variants single,specialists,adaptive --repeat 3 --prettyOpenAI Responses, Anthropic, OpenRouter, and Ollama share usage accounting.
Provider token counts and estimates are distinguished; unconfigured prices remain
unknown. Configure role models, reasoning effort, context limits, and request or
dollar budgets in codesm.json (configuration).
The evaluation and event logs make this a testbed as well as a coding tool. Use repeated runs to assess correctness, latency, and cost on your own tasks; more agents do not automatically mean better results. See the benchmark guide for fixture isolation and report semantics.
The name is code plus the same "ism" suffix you see in aphorism, mechanism, organism. It implies a system, a set of habits, a way of doing a thing. Codesm is the code writing system I built to figure out my own habits around working with coding models, and where those habits diverge from what the models actually do.
(It also reads nicely as "code ism": a philosophy, not a tool. That is on purpose.)
- Overview
- Features
- Failure Modes Observed
- Installation
- Usage
- Configuration
- MCP Integration
- How It Works
- Architecture
- Development
- Supported Platforms
- CLI Reference
- Contributing
- Acknowledgments
- License
- Many providers. Native OpenAI Responses and Anthropic Messages, compatible APIs for Kimi, GLM, Gemini, DeepSeek, xAI, and Mistral, plus OpenRouter and local Ollama. Discover current models with
codesm models --refresh, use exact model IDs, and route specialists with per-role profiles. - ReAct loop. Canonical reason then act agent loop with streaming, automatic iteration limits, and per iteration context budget checks. Implemented in
codesm/agent/loop.py. - Thirty built in tools.
bash,read,write,edit,multiedit,patch,grep,glob,ls,codesearch(embedding based),lsp(symbols, diagnostics, references),git,websearch,webfetch,oracle(deep reasoning),refactor,testgen,bug_localize,code_review,mermaid, and more. All registered through a centraltool/registry.py. - MCP server integration. Speaks Model Context Protocol natively. Load external tools from any MCP server (
mcp-servers.json), or expose Codesm's own tools over MCP to other agents. Full client, codegen, and sandbox implementation incodesm/mcp/. - Parallel subagents.
parallel_taskstool runs up to ten subagents concurrently viaasyncio.gather, with auto routing, fail fast, and per task timing. Built for embarrassingly parallel work (find all API endpoints AND analyze auth flow AND locate tests). - Pipeline subagents.
pipelinetool chains subagents sequentially, passing each step's output to the next. Up to five stages. Built for compositional tasks where later stages depend on earlier ones. - Staged orchestration.
orchestratetool: sequential stages, parallel tasks within each stage. The natural shape for "research then plan then implement then test" workflows. - Context compaction.
ContextManagerestimates tokens, triggers compaction at a configurable ratio of the max, and summarizes older messages via an LLM while preserving recent turns. Wired directly into the ReAct loop so compaction happens mid conversation, not just at session boundaries. - LSP backed code intelligence. Real Language Server Protocol integration (
codesm/lsp/) for symbol lookup, diagnostics, hover, and references. Gives the agent ground truth about types and symbols instead of making it guess from context. - Embedding code search.
codesearchtool uses sentence transformers for semantic code retrieval, not just string match. Handy when the agent has no idea what file to read next. - Permission system. Structured permission requests for file writes, edits, and shell commands via
codesm/permission/. Every grant and deny goes to an append only audit log. - Audit log.
codesm/audit/records file operations, bash executions, permission decisions, and tool call traces. Designed so you can replay a session and reconstruct exactly what the agent did. - Session management. Each run is a session: title, topics, summary, message history, event stream. Sessions persist, so you can resume a conversation or inspect a past run.
- Textual TUI. Full-width streaming transcript, expandable tool output and diffs, specialist activity, a fixed prompt, command palette, and slash commands. Built on Textual.
- Skills system. Skill suggestions aware of file context. The agent gets different prompts depending on whether it is editing Python, Rust, TypeScript, or SQL. Implemented in
codesm/skills/. - Multiple memory layers. Session memory, project memory (CLAUDE.md and AGENTS.md style files), and topic indexed rolling summaries.
Why this section exists: Codesm is instrumented to surface failure modes that most agents hide. These are real things I hit while building and using it. Each one has the shape of a future benchmark or eval.
-
Silent context overflow. ReAct loops blow up context fast. Every tool call appends a
tool_useand atool_resultblock. By iteration twenty of a real coding task, you are often past the model's useful attention window even if you are still under its hard limit. Codesm'sContextManagermonitors token estimates and triggers an LLM based compaction before the loop stalls. The summarizer is provider agnostic. Seesession/summarize.pyfor the three paths (_summarize_with_anthropic,_summarize_with_openai,_summarize_with_openrouter). -
Out of order tool call streaming. Different providers interleave
textandtool_useblocks differently when streaming. Claude emits text and tool_use in the order they were generated; OpenAI's Chat Completions stream has a different timing. A naive TUI that renders chunks as they arrive will show tool calls above the reasoning that justifies them. Fixed in commitf024ac2(fix(tui): display text and tool calls in sequential order) by buffering chunks until a message block is complete, then rendering in emission order. -
Tool name hallucination. Models occasionally emit a
tool_useblock with a tool name that does not exist in the registry, often a near miss likeread_fileinstead ofread, or a tool from a previous conversation that no longer exists. Codesm's registry returns a recoverable error ("Unknown tool: <name>. Available: ...") instead of crashing, so the model can self correct on the next turn. This turns a hard failure into a measurable self correction signal. -
Permission bypass via composition. Giving an agent
bashis effectively giving it everything. It canrm,curl, runpython -c, or dump secrets withcat ~/.ssh/id_rsa. Codesm's permission system wrapsbash,write, andeditthrough aPermissiongate with configurable allow lists and an audit trail. The interesting failure mode is composition: a model deniedrmwill sometimes try to accomplish the same thing viabash -c "python -c \"import os; os.remove(...)\"". Logging denials with the full command string makes these attempts visible and evaluable. -
Orchestration mode mismatch. Given a multi step task, models default to sequential execution even when subtasks are independent. Asking the same model the same question with
parallel_tasksvs a plain prompt produces dramatically different wall clock times and token usage. This is an evaluation axis in its own right: how well does the model choose betweenparallel_tasks,pipeline, and plain sequential tool calls? Codesm exposes all three primitives so you can measure it. -
Subagent result reintegration. When a parallel subagent returns a long result, the parent agent's next turn sometimes ignores it or summarizes it incorrectly. This is a context attention failure, not a capability failure. Codesm logs each subagent's full output to the event stream so you can diff what was produced against what was used.
Each of these is a real, reproducible phenomenon, not a theoretical concern. They are the raw material for the kind of eval suites coding model teams build.
# Clone and install with uv (recommended)
git clone https://github.com/Aditya-PS-05/codesm
cd codesm
uv pip install -e .
# Launch the TUI
codesm run
# Or run directly with uv
uv run codesm runThat is it. Set ANTHROPIC_API_KEY (or OPENAI_API_KEY, or point at a local Ollama) and start typing.
PyPI release: A proper PyPI package (
pip install codesm) is on the roadmap. For now, install from source. It is a singleuv pip install -e .away.
- Python 3.12 or newer
- uv (recommended) or
pipfor dependency management - At least one LLM provider configured:
- Optional LSP servers for richer code intelligence:
pylsporpyright(Python),rust-analyzer(Rust),typescript-language-server(TS and JS)
# Clone and install in editable mode
git clone https://github.com/Aditya-PS-05/codesm
cd codesm
uv venv
source .venv/bin/activate
uv pip install -e ".[dev]"
# Run tests
pytest tests/ -v
# Launch
codesm run# Launch the interactive TUI
codesm run
# Point at a specific provider and model
codesm run --model anthropic/claude-sonnet-5
codesm run --model openai/gpt-5.6-luna
codesm run --model ollama/llama3.1
# Resume a previous session
codesm run --session <SESSION_ID>
# Run a one shot task without the TUI (scriptable)
codesm chat "Add a docstring to the hello() function in /tmp/test.py"Inside the TUI, slash commands control the session:
/help Show all slash commands
/connect Connect a provider
/models Switch model
/mode Choose Smart or Rush mode
/theme Choose a color palette
/cost Inspect session usage and cost
/session Browse past sessions
/new Start a new session
The transcript fills the terminal without a sidebar. The prompt stays at the bottom, with the current model and estimated context remaining in the footer.
| Key | Action |
|---|---|
Ctrl+T |
Expand or collapse tool output, reasoning summaries, and specialist details |
Esc |
Interrupt active work |
Enter |
Send a message, or queue it while work is running |
Tab |
Queue a message during active work; switch Smart/Rush mode while idle |
Ctrl+P |
Open the command palette |
Use /theme to change colors; Terminal is the default palette. Use /cost
for usage details, including costs that remain unknown until pricing is configured.
List built-in model examples with codesm models, or query current catalogs with
codesm models --refresh. /models in the TUI uses the same catalog and accepts
exact provider/model-id values, including newly released models. See the
provider guide for verified model
IDs, official sources, credentials, and custom endpoints.
# Anthropic Claude (default)
export ANTHROPIC_API_KEY="sk-ant-..."
codesm run --model anthropic/claude-sonnet-5
# OpenAI
export OPENAI_API_KEY="sk-..."
codesm run --model openai/gpt-5.6-luna
# Kimi / GLM
export MOONSHOT_API_KEY="your-key"
codesm run --model kimi/kimi-k3
export ZAI_API_KEY="your-key"
codesm run --model zai/glm-5.3
# OpenRouter (routes to any model)
export OPENROUTER_API_KEY="sk-or-..."
codesm run --model openrouter/anthropic/claude-sonnet-5
# Ollama (local, no API key needed)
ollama serve
ollama pull llama3.1
codesm run --model ollama/llama3.1Configure different models for specialists in codesm.json:
{
"model": "anthropic/claude-sonnet-5",
"agents": {
"finder": {"model": "google/gemini-3.8-flash"},
"oracle": {"model": "openai/gpt-5.6-sol"}
}
}Codesm ships with 30 built in tools registered through codesm/tool/registry.py. They fall into broad categories:
| Category | Tools |
|---|---|
| File ops | read, write, edit, multiedit, multifile_edit, patch |
| Search | grep, glob, ls, codesearch (semantic), finder |
| Shell | bash (gated by permissions) |
| Code intelligence | lsp (symbols, hover, references), diagnostics |
| Git | git (status, diff, blame, log) |
| Web | websearch, webfetch, web |
| Subagents | parallel_tasks, pipeline, orchestrate, oracle (deep reasoning), task, batch |
| Code quality | refactor, testgen, bug_localize, code_review |
| Docs and diagrams | mermaid, handoff, read_thread, find_thread |
| MCP bridge | mcp_execute (call any tool from any connected MCP server) |
Each tool's description is loaded from a .txt file next to its .py implementation, so prompt tuning does not require touching code. See codesm/tool/bash.txt for an example.
The parallel_tasks tool runs up to ten subagents concurrently. Inspired by opencode's batch and task pattern.
{
"tasks": [
{
"subagent_type": "researcher",
"prompt": "Find all API endpoints in the codebase",
"description": "Find API endpoints"
},
{
"subagent_type": "researcher",
"prompt": "Analyze the authentication flow",
"description": "Analyze auth flow"
},
{
"subagent_type": "finder",
"prompt": "Find all test files",
"description": "Find test files"
}
],
"fail_fast": false
}Subagent types:
| Type | Best For | Default Model |
|---|---|---|
coder |
Multi file edits, feature implementation | Claude Sonnet |
researcher |
Read only code analysis | Claude Sonnet |
reviewer |
Bug detection, security review | Claude Sonnet |
planner |
Implementation plans | Claude Sonnet |
finder |
Fast code search | Gemini Flash |
oracle |
Deep reasoning | o1 |
librarian |
Multi repo research | Claude Sonnet |
auto |
Router picks the best agent for the task | Varies |
Features:
- Up to ten concurrent tasks (configurable cap to prevent resource exhaustion)
fail_fast: truecancels remaining tasks on first failure- Per task timing and success or failure indicators
- Combined result aggregation with truncation for long outputs
For sequential workflows where each step reads the previous step's output:
{
"steps": [
{
"subagent_type": "researcher",
"prompt": "Find all usages of the legacy_auth() function"
},
{
"subagent_type": "planner",
"prompt": "Plan a migration from legacy_auth() to the new auth system using the findings above"
},
{
"subagent_type": "coder",
"prompt": "Execute the migration plan"
}
]
}Each stage gets the previous stage's result injected into its prompt. Up to five pipeline steps.
For staged workflows (sequential stages, parallel tasks within each stage), use orchestrate:
{
"stages": [
[
{"subagent_type": "researcher", "prompt": "Analyze current auth system"},
{"subagent_type": "finder", "prompt": "Find all auth related files"}
],
[
{"subagent_type": "planner", "prompt": "Plan auth improvements"}
],
[
{"subagent_type": "coder", "prompt": "Implement planned changes"},
{"subagent_type": "coder", "prompt": "Add tests for new auth code"}
]
],
"fail_fast": true
}The ContextManager tracks estimated token usage and triggers compaction before the context window fills up. Compaction preserves a configurable "recent budget" of turns and replaces the older history with an LLM generated summary.
Configuration (defaults):
max_tokens = 128000 # adjust per model
compact_trigger_ratio = 0.75 # start compacting at 75% full
recent_budget_ratio = 0.30 # keep the last 30% of messages untouchedCompaction runs automatically inside the ReAct loop. See codesm/agent/loop.py line 44 to 49. You can also trigger it manually with /compact in the TUI.
Codesm's permission system (codesm/permission/permission.py) gates every destructive operation. Each request carries:
- Action (
bash,write,edit,delete) - Resource (the file path, command string, or URL)
- Session context (who is asking, what for)
The default policy prompts the user interactively (via the TUI); in non interactive mode it falls back to a config driven allow or deny list.
Every grant and denial is recorded in the audit log via codesm/audit/. The log captures:
- File operations (create, update, delete, diff summary)
- Bash executions (command, exit code, duration)
- Permission decisions (granted, denied, user cancelled)
- Tool call traces (tool name, arguments, result, timing)
Read it with:
codesm audit show <SESSION_ID>
codesm audit recentEvery Codesm run is a session. Sessions have:
- ID: deterministic, resumable
- Title: auto generated from the first user message via
session/title.py - Topics: indexed by
session/topics.pyfor fast search - Summary: rolling summary from the compaction pipeline
- Events: structured event stream (tool calls, permissions, errors)
codesm sessions list # List recent sessions
codesm sessions show <ID> # Print session details
codesm run --session <ID> # Resume a session in the TUICodesm reads its config from ~/.config/codesm/config.toml. Example:
[default]
provider = "anthropic"
model = "claude-sonnet-4-5"
max_iterations = 50
[context]
max_tokens = 128000
compact_trigger_ratio = 0.75
recent_budget_ratio = 0.30
[permissions]
# Default policy: "ask" or "allow" or "deny"
bash = "ask"
write = "ask"
edit = "allow"
delete = "ask"
# Command level allow list for bash
bash_allow = ["ls", "cat", "grep", "rg", "pytest", "cargo test"]
[tui]
theme = "dark"
auto_compact_indicator = true
[providers.finder]
provider = "openrouter"
model = "google/gemini-flash-1.5"
[providers.oracle]
provider = "openai"
model = "o1"| Variable | Purpose |
|---|---|
ANTHROPIC_API_KEY |
Required for the Anthropic provider |
OPENAI_API_KEY |
Required for the OpenAI provider |
MOONSHOT_API_KEY |
Kimi credentials (KIMI_API_KEY also accepted) |
ZAI_API_KEY |
GLM credentials (GLM_API_KEY also accepted) |
GEMINI_API_KEY |
Google Gemini credentials (GOOGLE_API_KEY also accepted) |
DEEPSEEK_API_KEY |
DeepSeek credentials |
XAI_API_KEY |
xAI Grok credentials |
MISTRAL_API_KEY |
Mistral credentials |
OPENROUTER_API_KEY |
Required for OpenRouter routed models |
OLLAMA_HOST |
Ollama server URL (default http://localhost:11434) |
CODESM_CONFIG_DIR |
Override config directory (default ~/.config/codesm/) |
CODESM_DATA_DIR |
Override data directory (default ~/.local/share/codesm/) |
CODESM_MAX_ITERATIONS |
Cap on ReAct loop iterations per turn |
CODESM_LOG_LEVEL |
DEBUG, INFO, WARNING, ERROR (default INFO) |
Codesm is a full Model Context Protocol citizen. It can both consume tools from external MCP servers and expose its own tools as an MCP server.
Add servers to ~/.config/codesm/mcp-servers.json (a project level override at ./mcp-servers.json is also supported):
{
"mcpServers": {
"filesystem": {
"command": "npx",
"args": ["-y", "@modelcontextprotocol/server-filesystem", "/home/aditya"]
},
"github": {
"command": "npx",
"args": ["-y", "@modelcontextprotocol/server-github"],
"env": {
"GITHUB_PERSONAL_ACCESS_TOKEN": "${GITHUB_TOKEN}"
}
}
}
}On startup, Codesm connects to each server, fetches the tool list, and registers them through codesm/mcp/manager.py. They appear alongside the built in tools in the registry.
codesm mcp-server --port 3456Any MCP compatible agent (Claude Code, Cursor, Windsurf) can now call Codesm's 30 built in tools, including parallel_tasks, oracle, and codesearch, from its own context.
┌──────────────┐ ┌──────────────────┐ ┌──────────────────┐
│ You │────>│ Codesm │────>│ LLM Provider │
│ (TUI input │ │ ReAct loop │ │ Anthropic │
│ + slash │ │ Tool registry │ │ OpenAI │
│ commands) │ │ Context mgr │ │ OpenRouter │
│ │<────│ Permissions │<────│ Ollama │
└──────────────┘ │ Audit log │ └──────────────────┘
└────────┬─────────┘
│
┌─────────────┼─────────────┐
│ │ │
▼ ▼ ▼
┌───────────┐ ┌───────────┐ ┌───────────┐
│ Built in │ │ MCP │ │ Subagents │
│ tools │ │ servers │ │ (parallel │
│ (bash, │ │ (external │ │ pipeline │
│ read, │ │ tools) │ │ orches │
│ write, │ │ │ │ trate) │
│ LSP...) │ │ │ │ │
└───────────┘ └───────────┘ └───────────┘
- You type a task in the TUI (or pass it via
codesm run) - The ReAct loop sends the conversation and tool schemas to the provider
- The provider streams back text and/or tool calls
- The TUI renders text chunks and buffers tool calls until the block is complete
- Each tool call is dispatched through the registry:
- Built in tools execute inline
- MCP tools are proxied to the external server via stdio or HTTP
- Subagent tools (
parallel_tasks,pipeline,orchestrate) spawn new ReAct loops with fresh tool registries
- Before each provider call, the
ContextManagerchecks token usage and compacts if needed - Destructive operations pass through the permission system; everything lands in the audit log
- When the provider stops requesting tools, the session completes and the result streams to the TUI
The full agent execution graph, including parallel and pipeline orchestration:
flowchart TD
A[User Input] --> B[Agent.stream]
B --> C[ReAct Loop Execute]
C --> D[Provider API Call]
D --> E{Response Type?}
E -->|Text| F[Add Assistant Message]
E -->|Tool Call| G[Extract Tool Call]
E -->|Parallel Tasks| PA[Parallel Subagent Spawning]
G --> H{Tool Type?}
H -->|Built in| J[Direct Tool Execution]
H -->|MCP Tool| I[MCP Execute]
I --> K[Generate Python Code]
K --> L[Execute in Subprocess]
L --> M[MCP Client Call]
M --> N[MCP Server Process]
N --> O[Tool Implementation]
O --> P[Tool Result]
J --> Q[Tool.execute method]
Q --> R{Tool Category?}
R -->|File Ops| S[read, write, edit]
R -->|Search| T[grep, glob, codesearch]
R -->|External| U[bash, webfetch]
R -->|Subagent| V[task, oracle]
S --> W[File System Operations]
T --> X[Search Operations]
U --> Y[External Process or API]
V --> Z[Spawn Subagent]
W --> P
X --> P
Y --> P
Z --> AA[Subagent Result]
AA --> P
PA --> PB{Orchestration Type?}
PB -->|parallel_tasks| PC[Concurrent Execution]
PB -->|orchestrate| PD[Staged Execution]
PB -->|pipeline| PE[Sequential Chain]
PC --> PF[asyncio.gather]
PD --> PG[Stage 1 Parallel] --> PH[Stage 2 Parallel] --> PI[Stage N Parallel]
PE --> PJ[Step 1] --> PK[Pass Result] --> PL[Step 2]
PF --> PM[Subagent 1]
PF --> PN[Subagent 2]
PF --> PO[Subagent N]
PM --> PQ[Aggregate Results]
PN --> PQ
PO --> PQ
PI --> PQ
PL --> PQ
PQ --> P
P --> BB[Add Tool Result Message]
BB --> CC[Update Session State]
CC --> DD{More Tool Calls?}
DD -->|Yes| G
DD -->|No| EE[Continue ReAct Loop]
EE --> D
F --> FF[Session Complete]
CC --> GG[Context Manager]
GG --> HH{Should Compact?}
HH -->|Yes| II[LLM Summarize]
HH -->|No| JJ[Continue]
II --> JJ
Package layout:
codesm/agent/: ReAct loop, agent, subagent, router, orchestratorcodesm/provider/: Native/compatible clients, provider routing, and model discoverycodesm/tool/: all built in tools, registry, descriptionscodesm/mcp/: MCP client, manager, sandbox, codegen, servercodesm/session/: session state, context manager, summarizer, topicscodesm/permission/: permission system and request typescodesm/audit/: append only audit logcodesm/lsp/: Language Server Protocol clientcodesm/search/: embedding based code searchcodesm/memory/: project, session, and topic memory layerscodesm/skills/: skill suggestions aware of file contextcodesm/tui/: Textual app, chat, modals, command palette, autocompletecodesm/config/: config schema and loadercodesm/snapshot/: file snapshots for atomic edits and rollback
Quick setup: See the Quick Start. This section is for contributors.
python --version # 3.12+
uv --version # latest
# Optional: a local Ollama server for offline testing
ollama --version# Clone and set up
git clone https://github.com/Aditya-PS-05/codesm
cd codesm
uv venv
source .venv/bin/activate
uv pip install -e ".[dev]"
# Run the TUI
codesm run
# Run a one shot task
codesm chat "Summarize the README"
# Run the test suite
pytest tests/ -v
# Lint (if ruff is installed)
ruff check codesm/Advanced Development
| Command | Description |
|---|---|
uv pip install -e ".[dev]" |
Install with dev dependencies (pytest, pytest-asyncio) |
pytest tests/ -v |
Run the test suite |
pytest tests/test_mcp.py |
Run just the MCP integration tests |
python -m codesm.tui.app |
Launch the TUI directly (skip the CLI entry point) |
codesm chat <prompt> |
Run a one shot task without entering the TUI |
codesm/: the Python packagetests/: unit and integration testsexamples/: runnable examples, includingmcp_demo.pyandmcp_code_execution_demo.pyprompts/: system prompts for agents and subagentspackages/: reserved for future split packages (e.g. standalone MCP server)assets/: logo, screenshots, demo mediamcp-servers.json: MCP server registry
# Unit tests
pytest tests/ -v
# Single file
pytest tests/test_mcp.py -v
# Run with coverage
pytest tests/ --cov=codesm --cov-report=term-missing| Platform | Architecture | Status |
|---|---|---|
| Linux | x86_64 | Primary development target |
| Linux | aarch64 | Supported |
| macOS | aarch64 (Apple Silicon) | Supported |
| macOS | x86_64 | Supported |
| Windows | x86_64 | Experimental (Textual TUI works; some tools assume POSIX shells) |
Codesm is pure Python. No native compilation beyond what pip resolves for its dependencies. If you have a working Python 3.12 and can install textual, you can run Codesm.
codesm [OPTIONS]
--provider <PROVIDER> anthropic, openai, openrouter, ollama
--model <MODEL> Model name (e.g. claude-sonnet-4-5, gpt-4o, llama3.1)
--resume <SESSION_ID> Resume a past session
--config <PATH> Override config file path
--log-level <LEVEL> DEBUG, INFO, WARNING, ERROR
codesm chat <PROMPT> Run a one shot task without the TUI
codesm sessions list List recent sessions
codesm sessions show <ID> Print session details
codesm audit show <ID> Print audit log for a session
codesm audit recent Print recent audit entries
codesm mcp-server Start Codesm as an MCP server for other agents
codesm --help Show full help
Environment variables:
ANTHROPIC_API_KEY Required for Anthropic provider
OPENAI_API_KEY Required for OpenAI provider
OPENROUTER_API_KEY Required for OpenRouter provider
OLLAMA_HOST Ollama server URL (default http://localhost:11434)
CODESM_CONFIG_DIR Override ~/.config/codesm/
CODESM_DATA_DIR Override ~/.local/share/codesm/
CODESM_MAX_ITERATIONS Cap the ReAct loop per turn
CODESM_LOG_LEVEL Logging verbosity
Contributions are welcome. I especially want new tools, new subagent types, new failure modes documented in Failure Modes Observed, and provider adapters.
TL;DR for a first PR:
- Fork the repo and create a feature branch.
- Make your change, add a test under
tests/. - Run locally:
pytest tests/ -v ruff check codesm/ # if you have ruff installed - Commit with a Conventional Commits message (
feat:,fix:,docs:,refactor:...). - Open a PR describing the why, not just the what.
If you are adding a new tool, the convention is:
codesm/tool/<name>.py: the implementation (subclassBaseTool, implementexecute)codesm/tool/<name>.txt: the prompt description shown to the model- Register it in
codesm/tool/registry.py - Add a test under
tests/test_tools_<name>.py
- Anthropic and OpenAI for the model APIs Codesm is built on top of
- Ollama for making local model inference painless
- OpenRouter for unified routing across providers
- Textual and Rich for the TUI framework
- Typer for the CLI ergonomics
- The Model Context Protocol team at Anthropic for the MCP specification
- The original ReAct paper (Yao et al., 2022). Still the most useful mental model for structuring agent loops.
- Claude Code, Cursor, Amp, Aider, and opencode. Reference points for what a good coding agent feels like, and for specific design patterns (batch and task orchestration, staged execution) this project borrows from.
- TryAudex for the README layout this project copied wholesale.
- Every researcher who has written about coding agent failure modes. This tool exists to make more of them visible.
MIT, by Aditya Pratap Singh
If you find this project useful, please consider starring it or follow me on GitHub for more work on AI coding agents, agent infrastructure, and model evaluation tooling. Issues, PRs, and new failure modes all welcome.
