Skip to content

Improve support for WebFlux RouterFunction #4

@neiser

Description

@neiser

Open points:

  • The RouterFunctionAnalysis does not handle nesting of router functions, also the integration test App27 only tests very simple router function definitions.

  • The competition library springdoc-open-api has the idea of providing some helper predicates to support router functions better. A first attempt has been NamedHeaderPredicate in this library. Investigate this option closer.

  • Improve support for Content-Type and Accept header based content negotiation as we do for WebMVC handler methods

  • Improve finding the response code of a router function, see RouterFunctionHandlerMethodMapper.ResponseMapper

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    enhancementNew feature or request

    Type

    No type
    No fields configured for issues without a type.

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions