Replies: 1 comment
-
|
That is very far from Wolfi's goal and aim. It's probably doable, but a lot of work. Personally, I would look at other distros. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
Either for embedded systems, or building things like AppImages with bundled libraries so as not to be dependent on the host system. (The latter is a real thing, some folks figured out how to make it all work. I just don't want to use Arch Linux's packages for it due to size or their compacted libraries due to not trusting them as much.) I also think there will be more containerized graphical applications soon and not all of them will be Flatpaks.
Does it make sense to use another distribution instead that supports graphical packages? I am mainly trying to avoid having to build a bunch of libraries myself but instead get them from a trusted source. And I'd like that to be wolfi but I understand that's currently pretty much out of scope for wolfi.
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions