Replies: 4 comments 13 replies
-
|
Hi, @ddennedy what does the "invalid" label means? Do I need to add more information or details? |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
This is a feature request and not a bug report. See GitHub broke their own feature by no longer showing that by default. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
Looking at current implementation of audio scrubbing it seems like it is just getting the audio at current frame and doing no modification. I know that MLT is capable of time stretching with pitch compensation. Would there be a way to leverage this capability for playback? |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
Can this discussion be transferred to the issue queue as a feature request ? |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
Hi,
Right now, consumers like SDL2 or RtAudio support turning audio scrubbing on or off, but they don't offer a way to choose the type of audio scrubbing we want to use.
From my experience, the type of audio scrubbing currently used is Cut-and-paste audio scrubbing. This type of audio scrubbing is producing really annoying audio artifacts when trying to listen a media at a speed different than 1, for instance 2 times playback speed. This makes anything but short listening sessions unbearable. This use case (playing multimedia content at speed higher than one for long periods) is frequent in video editing and is used more and more in video consumption nowadays.
It is a wide spread feature in modern video players, a seemingly ubiquitous one. So much so that users can't spot that the feature is missing and just think that there is a bug. People are used to turn playback speed to 2 and have clean audio playback on services like youtube, podcast players, video editors etc.
I might have missed something, and there could be a way to have timeline stretching audio scrubbing using MLT right now, but I didn't find anything.
It's a much needed feature for a modern multimedia processing framework, and I think it should be considered as a priority since its addition could benefit MLT and its users greatly.
Thanks and have a nice day!
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions