Add net10.0, update packages

[michal12334]

No description provided.

[github-actions]

Test Results

  3 files  + 1    3 suites  +1   1m 30s ⏱️ +27s
 85 tests ± 0   85 ✅ ± 0  0 💤 ±0  0 ❌ ±0 
276 runs  +92  276 ✅ +92  0 💤 ±0  0 ❌ ±0 

Results for commit 4d1c3ec. ± Comparison against base commit 8d0c9e1.

♻️ This comment has been updated with latest results.

[Saancreed]

But this, I think, should be bumpable to 10.0.0.

[Saancreed]

https://github.com/leancodepl/contractsgenerator/blob/v4.0.0-alpha.1/examples/project/Directory.Build.targets#L2-L6 will need some fixups, to remove net10.0 if current SDK (like 9.0.xxx) can't target it. Otherwise tests will fail in the way you see on CI.

(If you have an idea about how to make this more robust, feel free to experiment.)

[codecov-commenter]

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 75.87%. Comparing base (d2604e8) to head (7ff3014).
⚠️ Report is 23 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #177      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   81.26%   75.87%   -5.40%     
==========================================
  Files          34       37       +3     
  Lines         993     1061      +68     
  Branches      117      133      +16     
==========================================
- Hits          807      805       -2     
- Misses        141      204      +63     
- Partials       45       52       +7     

Flag	Coverage Δ
net10.0	75.87% <ø> (?)
net8.0	75.87% <ø> (-5.38%)	⬇️
net9.0	75.87% <ø> (-5.38%)	⬇️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

[jakubfijalkowski]

Let's remember to update the CHANGELOG (and release a 4.1 version afterwards) and we're good to go I think.

[Saancreed]

release a 4.1 version afterwards

And skip 4.0? Why?

[jakubfijalkowski]

release a 4.1 version afterwards

And skip 4.0? Why?

I missed that it is not released. Nevertheless, should it be released as-is, and .NET 10 should be in 4.1?

[michal12334]

release a 4.1 version afterwards

And skip 4.0? Why?

I missed that it is not released. Nevertheless, should it be released as-is, and .NET 10 should be in 4.1?

Yea, I think so.