Top logo as `.svg`

[mxmxchere]

I like to heavily zoom webpages and the top logo becomes blurry then (it is a .png).

I would like to replace it with its .svg counterpart but I have not found a version with text (I found old ones with text but they have been removed, I guess for a reason). I would have done it myself but I was not able to figure out which font has been used to generate the .png. Does anybody know the font or even has a readymade .svg version of the top logo with text?

[domo141]

I probably have somewhere, one where i used either fontforge or hb-view to convert the text glypfs of a font file
to svg... I recall I was too lazy to look proper copyright text to the final .svg at that time (some years ago)...
... I'll look it up...

[johanmalm]

It is here: https://github.com/labwc/labwc-artwork/tree/main/utils/mklabimg

[domo141]

right. that mklabing was the reason I dropped my efforts :D

If I had the same font (the same nunito),
hb-view path/to/nunito.(ttf|otf) -O svg -o labwc-just-text.svg labwc
would produce quite similar text content (extra <g> inside <defs> and same glyph-0-1... names),
tried with some cantarell.otf font I had downloaded from somewhere...

[johanmalm]

I find that svg images render inconsistently which is why I opted for converting it to png. Appreciate guidance from anyone with domain knowledge.

[mxmxchere]

So I tried the svg version and it looks much better I think. Do you refer to inconsistencies between browsers? I checked Firefox and and Chromium briefly and I could not see a difference (except of course that the svg version remains sharp independent of the zoom level).

Also when you zoom a lot and make the frame small the .png gets squeezed horizontally vs. the .svg shrinks to fit. But now I am talking about a really small frame and heavy zooming, a combination that does not make so much sense.

So I prefer the .svg but @johanmalm it is your baby here so you have the last say :)

[johanmalm]

Fixed by #98