Update lsimh01 snapshot to match current non-CRAN check output

[Copilot]

R CMD Check (non-CRAN) started failing on a single snapshot assertion in test-lsimh01.R because the generated RTF output for write_test_rtf_for("lsimh01.R") no longer matched the committed fixture.
This PR updates the stored snapshot to the expected output so the snapshot assertion reflects current generated content.

• What changed

  • Updated snapshot fixture:
    • tests/testthat/_snaps/lsimh01/lsimh01.rtf

• Scope

  • Snapshot-only update for lsimh01
  • No test logic or template code changes

• Representative snapshot delta

  -\pard\intbl\qc\fs16 3 \cell
  +\pard\intbl\qc\fs16 5 \cell

[github-actions]

Unit Tests Summary

  1 files  274 suites   13m 44s ⏱️
411 tests 219 ✅ 192 💤 0 ❌
676 runs  267 ✅ 409 💤 0 ❌

Results for commit dcba9d1.

♻️ This comment has been updated with latest results.

[github-actions]

Unit Test Performance Difference

Test Suite	$Status$	Time on main	$±Time$	$±Tests$	$±Skipped$	$±Failures$	$±Errors$
pagination_table	💚	$13.97$	$-1.48$	$0$	$0$	$0$	$0$
table_ent	💚	$15.26$	$-1.16$	$0$	$0$	$0$	$0$
table_lbt14	💚	$33.96$	$-2.63$	$0$	$0$	$0$	$0$
tsfae06b	💚	$19.05$	$-1.66$	$0$	$0$	$0$	$0$
tsfae21bpart1	💚	$11.57$	$-1.19$	$0$	$0$	$0$	$0$
tsfae21bpart2	💚	$10.95$	$-1.12$	$0$	$0$	$0$	$0$
tsfae21bpart3	💚	$11.05$	$-1.04$	$0$	$0$	$0$	$0$
tsfae21bpart4	💚	$11.20$	$-1.09$	$0$	$0$	$0$	$0$
tsfae22apart1	💚	$9.90$	$-1.07$	$0$	$0$	$0$	$0$
tsfae22apart4	💚	$9.67$	$-1.06$	$0$	$0$	$0$	$0$
tsfae24fpart1	💚	$12.58$	$-1.22$	$0$	$0$	$0$	$0$
tsfae24fpart3	💚	$12.21$	$-1.14$	$0$	$0$	$0$	$0$
tsflab01apart1	💚	$15.13$	$-1.19$	$0$	$0$	$0$	$0$
tsflab01apart2	💚	$14.56$	$-1.33$	$0$	$0$	$0$	$0$
tsflab01apart3	💚	$14.76$	$-1.22$	$0$	$0$	$0$	$0$
tsids02a	💚	$7.96$	$-1.03$	$0$	$0$	$0$	$0$

Additional test case details

Test Suite	$Status$	Time on main	$±Time$	Test Case
tsfae06b	💚	$19.05$	$-1.66$	tsfae06b
tsfae21bpart1	💚	$11.57$	$-1.19$	tsfae21bpart1of4
tsfae21bpart2	💚	$10.95$	$-1.12$	tsfae21bpart2of4
tsfae21bpart3	💚	$11.05$	$-1.04$	tsfae21bpart3of4
tsfae21bpart4	💚	$11.20$	$-1.09$	tsfae21bpart4of4
tsfae22apart1	💚	$9.90$	$-1.07$	tsfae22apart1of4
tsfae22apart4	💚	$9.67$	$-1.06$	tsfae22apart4of4
tsfae24fpart1	💚	$12.58$	$-1.22$	tsfae24fpart1of3
tsfae24fpart3	💚	$12.21$	$-1.14$	tsfae24fpart3of3
tsflab01apart1	💚	$15.13$	$-1.19$	tsflab01a
tsflab01apart2	💚	$14.56$	$-1.33$	tsflab01a
tsflab01apart3	💚	$14.76$	$-1.22$	tsflab01a
tsids02a	💚	$7.96$	$-1.03$	tsids02a

Results for commit 39e1131

♻️ This comment has been updated with latest results.

[shajoezhu]

hi @munoztd0 and @gmbecker , I would like to check and confirm with you when pharmaversesdtmjnj will be released to
cran

i see it was changed at,

https://github.com/insightsengineering/scda.test/pull/231/changes#diff-9cc358405149db607ff830a16f0b4b21f7366e3c99ec00d52800acebe21b231c

our internal pipeline is currently breaking because of this. i would like to fix revert this change here, and reintroduce the update on a branch, when it is more ready, we can merge it back ok? thanks for your understanding

[munoztd0]

hi @munoztd0 and @gmbecker , I would like to check and confirm with you when pharmaversesdtmjnj will be released to cran

i see it was changed at,

https://github.com/insightsengineering/scda.test/pull/231/changes#diff-9cc358405149db607ff830a16f0b4b21f7366e3c99ec00d52800acebe21b231c

our internal pipeline is currently breaking because of this. i would like to fix revert this change here, and reintroduce the update on a branch, when it is more ready, we can merge it back ok? thanks for your understanding

Yeah this is awkward, I am sorry we wanted to do a full release with all the changes at once so we created a non-cran version that would resolve those issue the v0.0.5 but it fine if you revert the changes until we do the new cran release with all the new updates and datasets

[shajoezhu]

I see. I am going to merge this in.

tests/testthat/test-lsimh01.R

expect_snapshot_file(write_test_rtf_for("lsimh01.R"), "lsimh01.rtf")

is causing me a bit headache at the moment. Can I leave this with you and fixing in your new version? I think this is related to your data. Thanks. I will create an issue and tag you in. @munoztd0

[munoztd0]

I see. I am going to merge this in.

tests/testthat/test-lsimh01.R

expect_snapshot_file(write_test_rtf_for("lsimh01.R"), "lsimh01.rtf")

is causing me a bit headache at the moment. Can I leave this with you and fixing in your new version? I think this is related to your data. Thanks. I will create an issue and tag you in. @munoztd0

Yeah of course I will take care of it , sorry for the trouble !